t; wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:00 AM Anand H. Krishnan
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I tried the 4.19.2 kernel without success. You were probably right
> > > that skb_orphan
> > > is indeed called fro
] ? __do_page_fault+0x270/0x4d0
[ 324.709919] __x64_sys_sendto+0x28/0x30
[ 324.709924] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x120
[ 324.709926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Thanks,
Anand
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:11 AM Willem de Bruijn
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:29 PM Anand H. Krishnan
&g
Ok. I have 4.18.11 ubuntu. I will try out the latest kernel and will
let you know.
Thank you for your opinion and help.
Thanks,
Anand
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:11 AM Willem de Bruijn
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:29 PM Anand H. Krishnan
> wrote:
> >
> > skb_scrub_pa
[bump]
Hello,
Any ideas? AF_PACKET with veth seems to be incompatible. I am using DPDK to bind
af_packet with one end of VETH pair and the other end of the pair is
in a container.
Thanks,
Anand
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:42 PM Anand H. Krishnan
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are seei
Hello,
We are seeing a problem with AF_PACKET when used along with the
veth interfaces. SCP complains that message authentication code is
incorrect.
I was browsing the code and I see that veth_xmit calls dev_forward_skb
which does a skb_scrub_packet, which in turn calls the skb destructor fun
Hello,
Is skb_gro_receive doing the right thing for cloned packets?
When we are merging fragments, we do not seem to be taking a reference
to the underlying page. To me, it looks like it should work fine for non-cloned
packets. However, for cloned packets, when the gro-ed packet is eventually
fre
