Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)

2006-12-18 Thread Alex Romosan
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would comment the message out. I added it to see how often the recovery > was triggering.. i'll probably do that eventually. so far it's triggered 97 times in 249 seconds. --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and

Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)

2006-12-18 Thread Alex Romosan
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I fixed a bunch of stuff (see ChangeLog) and made a 2.6.19 or later > version see: > http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/prototypes/sk98lin-8.41.tar.gz > > It is too noisy in the console log, because it shows how many times > the driver dope s

Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)

2006-12-15 Thread Alex Romosan
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I fixed a bunch of stuff (see ChangeLog) and made a 2.6.19 or later > version see: > http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/prototypes/sk98lin-8.41.tar.gz > > It is too noisy in the console log, because it shows how many times > the driver dope s

Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)

2006-12-14 Thread Alex Romosan
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a fixed up version of the vendor driver, I'll repackage it tomorrow. as per the include file, i ended up replacing all the CHECKSUM_HW with CHECkSUM_PARTIAL since the functions in questions had to do with transmit. seems to be working so far

Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)

2006-12-14 Thread Alex Romosan
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If this is repeatable... and mac_pause is always one then the > problem is hardware flow control. I saw bugs before in the bus > interface where it would not resume on unaligned buffer, but > that was on receive. i tried to switch over to the lates

Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)

2006-12-14 Thread Alex Romosan
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another useful bit of information is the statistics (ethtool -S eth0). > When there were flow control bugs, they would show up as count of 1. the driver locked up again, even with msi interrupts disabled and idle_timeout=10. the console message was

Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)

2006-12-14 Thread Alex Romosan
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another useful bit of information is the statistics (ethtool -S > eth0). When there were flow control bugs, they would show up as > count of 1. > > Are you doing jumbo frames (MTU > 1500)? i just did 'ethtool -S eth0' (the card is still working fine

Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)

2006-12-14 Thread Alex Romosan
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another useful bit of information is the statistics (ethtool -S eth0). > When there were flow control bugs, they would show up as count of 1. we'll see if the machine locks up again. > Are you doing jumbo frames (MTU > 1500)? no (or at least i don

Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)

2006-12-14 Thread Alex Romosan
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 4) What is the IRQ routing? >There are two issues here, first the driver will never work with edge >trigger IRQ's, some motherboards also have busted BIOS and chipsets >that don't do MSI properly. A couple of module parameters are availab

Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)

2006-12-14 Thread Alex Romosan
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:47:05 -0800 > Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> under heavy network load the sky2 driver (compiled in the kernel) >> locks up and the only way i can get the network back is to re

Re: 2.6.19-rc1 regression: airo suspend fails

2006-10-07 Thread Alex Romosan
Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I believe it was broken by: > http://www.kernel.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3b4c7d640376dbccfe80fc4f7b8772ecc7de28c5 > > I have seen this in the -mm tree, but didn't follow up at the time. I > was able to fix

Re: 2.6.19-rc1 regression: airo suspend fails

2006-10-06 Thread Alex Romosan
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:31:16PM -0700, Alex Romosan wrote: >> Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > so please give it a good testing, and let's see if there are any >> > regressions