Actually, there is a suricata with the following rules:
#pass tls any any -> any any (pcre: "/play.google.com/i";
tls_sni;nfq_set_mark:0x8/0x; sid:2466;)
#pass tls any any -> any any (pcre: "/google.com/i";
tls_sni;nfq_set_mark:0x8/0x; sid:2465;)
#pass tls any any -> any any (pcr
Why, when using the 4.16 kernel on the host system, is there such a strange
behavior of virtual machines? What is the problem? He rolled back to 4.9.c -
the problem was gone.
tcpdump on router:
tcpdump: listening on vlan-00110013, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
262144 bytes
23:59:08.
Please tell me if the MPLS-TP implementation in Linux is being implemented?
RFC:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5654
Tell me please, when in linux is planned the realization of multicast MPLS?
Etnernet Tipe: 0c8848
CC [M] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.o
In file included from ./include/net/vxlan.h:6:0,
from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c:60:
./include/net/dst_metadata.h: In function ‘skb_vpls_info’:
./include/net/dst_metadata.h:36:9: error: implicit declaration o
And what happened to him?
Hello, when will VPLS be implemented in Linux? August 15, 2017 were patches
from ekoinoks, which in Linux added support for VPLS. But, these patches for
some reason did not pass. Also, for some reason, the author of these patches
has no activity on, for two months. I think so, if activity does n
When will support for VPLS appear in Linux? 08/21/2017 David Lamparter has
already sent these patches, but they are not in the kernel for some reason, not
populi. Such question, when all the same these patches will get to a kernel?
Here is a link to this email:
https://www.mail-archive.com/net
There was a message with patches of VPLS in the Linux kernel. But they somehow
did not fall into the next. What about the development of the Linux subsystem
in Linux?
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /lists/kernel/ on this server.
Apache/2.4.6 (CentOS) Server at www.spinics.net Port 443
I updated the kernel 4.12.6. When the mote is hung on the route more than 8
mpls of marks through iproute2, I get the following:
root@ne-vlezay80:~# ip route add 10.10.10.0/24 encap mpls
50/60/70/80/90/100/110/120/130 dev lo
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
root@ne-vlezay80:~# ip route add 1
Testing MPLS from Linux kernel 4.12. The trace route is duplicete pe-p hop.
This is not visible MPLS label on traceroute.
root@ne-vlezay80:~# traceroute -e 10.10.10.4
traceroute to 10.10.10.4 (10.10.10.4), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 10.5.5.1 (10.5.5.1) 0.028 ms 0.005 ms 0.006 ms
2 10.4
As I understand it, the patch will be available in the linux kernel or as a
separate application based on tap?
06.07.2017, 16:21, "Vincent JARDIN" :
> Le 06/07/2017 à 11:13, Алексей Болдырев a écrit :
>> Is there any plan for developing mpls pseudowire dliver for linux.
Is there any plan for developing mpls pseudowire dliver for linux. And also, is
it possible to write a driver for MPLS pseudowire on the basis of tun / tap?
Короче, имеем ядро 4.11.4. При передаче данных через veth, мы получаем скорость
примерно такую:
root@containers:~# iperf3 -c 10.194.1.3
Connecting to host 10.194.1.3, port 5201
[ 4] local 10.194.1.2 port 55640 connected to 10.194.1.3 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 1621.875870] BUG: Bad page state in process Compositor pfn:c03e2
[ 1621.875876] page:ea000300f880 count:-1 mapcount:0 mapping: (null)
index:0x0
[ 1621.875878] flags: 0x100()
[ 1621.875881] raw: 0100
[ 1621.875882] ra
As I understand it, it's enough to just set the variable in the source
#define FLOW_MAX_MPLS_LABELS 3
on
#define FLOW_MAX_MPLS_LABELS 7
Or is there somehow still pitfalls?
04.05.2017, 00:22, "Joe Stringer" :
> On 3 May 2017 at 14:19, Алексей Болдырев
> wrote:
>> Is i
Is it possible to increase this limit in OpenVswitch?
03.05.2017, 23:21, "Joe Stringer" :
> On 3 May 2017 at 11:14, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 5/3/17 11:33 AM, Алексей Болдырев wrote:
>>> I watched one forum, there is listed in the properties of one lic
I watched one forum, there is listed in the properties of one license for
Cisco, it says:
Layer 3 VPN • Multi-VRF CE (VRF-lite); requires IP Services Feature license
• MPLS VPN; requires Advanced IP Feature license
• 26 VRFs
• 8192 MPLS labels
Especially interested in the figure 8192 MPLS Label
Started MPLS on the branch - Everything was fine. When I tried to run MPLS on a
real network of virtual machines, there were problems with the speed:
root@containers:~# iperf3 -c 10.194.10.2 -B 10.194.10.1 -Z
Connecting to host 10.194.10.2, port 5201
[ 4] local 10.194.10.1 port 49533 conne
26.04.2017, 05:23, "David Ahern" :
> On 4/25/17 11:28 AM, Алексей Болдырев wrote:
>> 226 sysctl -w net.mpls.conf.lo.input=1
>> 227 sysctl -w net.mpls.platform_labels=1048575
>> 228 ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
>> 229 ip link add veth2 typ
Короче, вот конфиг MPLS на одном из дистрибутивов:
In short, here's the MPLS configuration on one of the distributions:
226 sysctl -w net.mpls.conf.lo.input=1
227 sysctl -w net.mpls.platform_labels=1048575
228 ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
229 ip link add veth2 type veth peer name vet
22 matches
Mail list logo
