On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 8:54 PM Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
> Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:12:51PM CEST, j...@resnulli.us wrote:
> >Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:20:04AM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
> >>On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:34:08AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >>> Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:27:08PM CEST, m...@redha
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:32 AM Daniel Jurgens wrote:
>
> The rtnl_lock would stay locked if allocating promisc_allmulti failed.
> Also changed the allocation to GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Fixes: ff7c7d9f5261 ("virtio_net: Remove command data from control_buf")
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet
> Link:
> https:
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:31:25AM -0500, Daniel Jurgens wrote:
> The rtnl_lock would stay locked if allocating promisc_allmulti failed.
> Also changed the allocation to GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Fixes: ff7c7d9f5261 ("virtio_net: Remove command data from control_buf")
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet
> Link:
>
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:31:25AM -0500, Daniel Jurgens wrote:
> The rtnl_lock would stay locked if allocating promisc_allmulti failed.
> Also changed the allocation to GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Fixes: ff7c7d9f5261 ("virtio_net: Remove command data from control_buf")
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet
> Link:
>
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:32 PM Daniel Jurgens wrote:
>
> The rtnl_lock would stay locked if allocating promisc_allmulti failed.
> Also changed the allocation to GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Fixes: ff7c7d9f5261 ("virtio_net: Remove command data from control_buf")
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet
> Link:
> https:/
On 5/15/2024 9:31 AM, Daniel Jurgens wrote:
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
The rtnl_lock would stay locked if allocating promisc_allmulti failed.
Also changed the allocation to GFP_KERNEL.
The rtnl_lock would stay locked if allocating promisc_allmulti failed.
Also changed the allocation to GFP_KERNEL.
Fixes: ff7c7d9f5261 ("virtio_net: Remove command data from control_buf")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cann89ilazvaucvhpm6rpjj0owra_ofnx7fhc8d60gv-65
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 5:12 PM Daniel Jurgens wrote:
>
> The rtnl_lock would stay locked if allocating promisc_allmulti failed.
>
> Fixes: ff7c7d9f5261 ("virtio_net: Remove command data from control_buf")
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cann89ilazvaucvhpm6rp
The rtnl_lock would stay locked if allocating promisc_allmulti failed.
Fixes: ff7c7d9f5261 ("virtio_net: Remove command data from control_buf")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cann89ilazvaucvhpm6rpjj0owra_ofnx7fhc8d60gv-65ad...@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:31:20AM -0500, Daniel Jurgens wrote:
> The rtnl_lock would stay locked if allocating promisc_allmulti failed.
>
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cann89ilazvaucvhpm6rpjj0owra_ofnx7fhc8d60gv-65ad...@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Dan
The rtnl_lock would stay locked if allocating promisc_allmulti failed.
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cann89ilazvaucvhpm6rpjj0owra_ofnx7fhc8d60gv-65ad...@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 inser
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:45 AM
> To: Dan Jurgens
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; m...@redhat.com; jasow...@redhat.com;
> xuanz...@linux.alibaba.com; virtualizat...@lists.linux.dev;
> da...@davemloft.net; k...@kernel.org; pab...@redhat.com; Jiri Pirko
>
> Subject: Re:
Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:12:51PM CEST, j...@resnulli.us wrote:
>Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:20:04AM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>>On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:34:08AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:27:08PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>>> >On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:11:49PM +0200, J
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 10:25 PM Daniel Jurgens wrote:
>
> Allocate memory for the data when it's used. Ideally the struct could
> be on the stack, but we can't DMA stack memory. With this change only
> the header and status memory are shared between commands, which will
> allow using a tighter loc
Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:20:04AM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:34:08AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:27:08PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>> >On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:11:49PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:52:52PM CEST, m...@
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:34:08AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:27:08PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
> >On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:11:49PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:52:52PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
> >> >On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:37:15PM +0200,
Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:27:08PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:11:49PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:52:52PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>> >On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:37:15PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Thu, May 09, 2024 at 04:28:12PM CEST, m...@
17 matches
Mail list logo
