From: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 06:24:29AM +0530
> Hi Jurriaan,
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:58:22PM -0700
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 01:09:18 EDT, "Constantine A. Murenin" said:
> The idea here is that no patching was needed in the first place --
> most of the files are/were BSD-licensed, because they were forked from
> OpenBSD.
Oh, silly me. For some reason, I had it in my head that Jiri's original
patch
From: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 06:24:29AM +0530
>
> The dmesg you posted below doesn't cover the messages from this oops
> itself. As you mentioned you can reproduce this oops easily, please do so,
> and post the *full* oops log (if it doesn't get logged to disk
On 01/09/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:55:37 +0200, Adrian Bunk said:
>
> > Jiri's patch would have wrongly not only removed the BSD statement from
> > dual licenced files but also from not dual licenced files.
> >
> > This was a mistake in this patch (th
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv4/af_inet.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index e681034..d5e8b67 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ static struct
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0039 RIP:
> [] tcp_rto_min+0xc/0x20
tcp_rto_min() lacks a check-for-NULL. You want 5c127c58ae9bf196 from
the net-2.6.git tree -- so this will be gone in -rc6.
> P.S.: uh-oh, it's "[
On Friday 31 August 2007 14:41, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 04:20:35PM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Resubmitting a bio or submitting a dependent bio from
> > inside a block driver does not need to be throttled because all
> > resources required to guarantee completion mu
Christian Kujau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> today I switched from 2.6.22.3 to 2.6.23-rc5 (skipped quite a few -rc
> versions due to lack of time), and the box keeps panicking under certain
> circumstances. I suspected disk related problems, because: when the box
> is up, I usually resume ~10
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks. I'm not sure either, it would require two concurrent requests
> to be processed, but AFAICS oidentd only uses a single netlink socket.
> Perhaps multiple running instances or something else using the inet_diag
> interface?
Since identd serves
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:55:37 +0200, Adrian Bunk said:
> Jiri's patch would have wrongly not only removed the BSD statement from
> dual licenced files but also from not dual licenced files.
>
> This was a mistake in this patch (that was never merged into the tree)
> neither Jiri nor Alan noticed
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 08:36:24PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
>
> On Sep 1, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>> OK, I begin to understand this, there seem to be three different types
>> of files changed by Jiri's patch:
>> 1. dual licenced files planned to make GPL-only
>> 2. previously dual l
On Sep 1, 2007, at 9:58 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote:
Suppose you saw some other variant of *nix that had some code you
wanted to use, but there was a gaping security hole in it. Wouldn't
you patch it before you incorporated it? and would it be your fault
if this fix made the code not work with t
Suppose you saw some other variant of *nix that had some code you wanted
to use, but there was a gaping security hole in it. Wouldn't you patch
it before you incorporated it? and would it be your fault if this fix
made the code not work with the original?
We took the code and fixed a gaping se
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 09:58:26PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> Suppose you saw some other variant of *nix that had some code you wanted
> to use, but there was a gaping security hole in it. Wouldn't you patch
> it before you incorporated it? and would it be your fault if this fix
> made the cod
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Indeed, it's upsetting that people like Luis Rodriguez push for the
lawyers to be involved to (fight?) an open source project. Why, may I
ask?
Is it not self-evident? Legal review is the sane course of action, when
legal issues are the bone of contention.
That
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 08:36:24PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>> OK, I begin to understand this, there seem to be three different types
>> of files changed by Jiri's patch:
>> 1. dual licenced files planned to make GPL-only
>> 2. previously dual lic
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 09:42:54PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> We asked SFLC to work with us to make sure that everyone's copyrights
> were respected in the right places, and that the licenses various developers
> wanted for their copyrights were implemented correctly. The patch I sent
> i
On 01/09/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When companies have taken our wireless device drivers, many many of
> them have given changes and fixes back. Some maybe didn't, but that
> is OK.
>
> When Linux took our changes back, they immediately locked the door
> against changes moving
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
Once the grantor (Reyk) releases his code under that license, it must
remain. You are free to derive work and redistribute under your
license, but the original copyright and license permission
On 9/1/07, Constantine A. Murenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jason Dixon wrote:
> > > Once the grantor (Reyk) releases his code under that license, it must
> > > remain. You are free to derive work and redistribute under your
> > > license,
On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Dixon wrote:
> > Once the grantor (Reyk) releases his code under that license, it must
> > remain. You are free to derive work and redistribute under your
> > license, but the original copyright and license permission remains
> > intact.
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 06:02:26PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> >As a free software user and developer, the question I have is how come
> >the Linux community feels that they can take the BSD code that was
> >reverse-engineered at OpenBSD, and put a more restrictive licence onto
> >it, such that there
Jason Dixon wrote:
Once the grantor (Reyk) releases his code under that license, it must
remain. You are free to derive work and redistribute under your
license, but the original copyright and license permission remains
intact. Many other entities (Microsoft, Apple, Sun, etc) have used BSD
c
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 06:36:36PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> When companies have taken our wireless device drivers, many many of
> them have given changes and fixes back. Some maybe didn't, but that
> is OK.
>
> When Linux took our changes back, they immediately locked the door
> against chan
diff -urNp linux-orig/net/core/pktgen.c linux-mod/net/core/pktgen.c
--- linux-orig/net/core/pktgen.c2007-08-31 02:21:01.0 -0400
+++ linux-mod/net/core/pktgen.c 2007-09-01 20:51:22.0 -0400
@@ -111,6 +111,9 @@
*
* 802.1Q/Q-in-Q support by Francesco Fondelli (FF)
<[EMAIL PR
net/sched/sch_cbq.c: In function 'cbq_enqueue':
net/sched/sch_cbq.c:383: warning: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this
function
has been verified to be a bogus case. So let's shut it up.
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sched/sch_cbq.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1
Bob Beck wrote:
I urge developers to not bait into this and just leave this alone.
Those involved know what they are doing and have a strong team of
attorneys watching their backs. Any *necessary* discussions are be
done privately.
Luis
What? when we talk about the ethics of coopera
On Sep 1, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
OK, I begin to understand this, there seem to be three different types
of files changed by Jiri's patch:
1. dual licenced files planned to make GPL-only
2. previously dual licenced files with a too recent version used
planned
to make GPL-only
On 9/2/07, David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Denis Cheng wrote
> > + order = get_bitmask_order(min(max, (unsigned long)UINT_MAX)) - 1;
> >
>
> Why doesn't this clash with the max define, also in linux/kernel.h?
They indeed don't clash,
the cpp included by gcc is intelligent enough, it k
On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:29:39PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:27:03PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > > On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAI
When companies have taken our wireless device drivers, many many of
them have given changes and fixes back. Some maybe didn't, but that
is OK.
When Linux took our changes back, they immediately locked the door
against changes moving back, by putting a GPL license on guard.
Why does our brother L
Hi Jurriaan,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:58:22PM -0700
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc4/2.6.23-rc4-mm1/
> > >
> > On this machine (Athlon 64 X2 4600, 4 GiB memory, lots of d
On 01/09/07, Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I urge developers to not bait into this and just leave this alone.
> Those involved know what they are doing and have a strong team of
> attorneys watching their backs. Any *necessary* discussions are be
> done privately.
Err...
I don't
Hi,
today I switched from 2.6.22.3 to 2.6.23-rc5 (skipped quite a few -rc
versions due to lack of time), and the box keeps panicking under certain
circumstances. I suspected disk related problems, because: when the box
is up, I usually resume ~10 bittorrent files. When doing this, each
file (
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:29:39PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:27:03PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:1
>As a free software user and developer, the question I have is how come
>the Linux community feels that they can take the BSD code that was
>reverse-engineered at OpenBSD, and put a more restrictive licence onto
>it, such that there will be no possibility of the changes going back
>to OpenBSD, give
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 04:41:12PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: I respect the GPL immensely, really I do - but I believe this type
> of action weakens us all.
> X-
I urge developers to not bait into this and just leave this alone.
Those involved know what they are doing and have a strong team of
attorneys watching their backs. Any *necessary* discussions are be
done privately.
Luis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the
On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:27:03PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > > On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAI
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 03:36:08AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc4/2.6.23-rc4-mm1/
>
> Got these on an i386 build with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y ...
>
> WARNING: "div64_64" [
- Forwarded message from Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I respect the GPL immensely, really I do - but I believe this type of
action weakens us all.
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on bofh.cns.ualber
Athanasius wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 06:38:23PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
You might be able to trigger it without this patch by running
"while true; do ss -tn; done" while doing ident queries, but
just running the while loop a couple of times in parallel
doesn't seem to trigger it here
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 03:36:08AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc4/2.6.23-rc4-mm1/
>
> Got these on an i386 build with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y ...
>
> WARNING: "div64_64" [
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 03:03:36PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> This will hopefull
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:51:49PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:54:57PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > > On 01/09/07, Jeff Garz
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
commit 6fdc0f061be94f5e297650961360fb7a9d1cc85d
Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Aug 30 17:53:42 2007 +0200
[NET_SCHED]: Make all rate based scheduler work with TSO.
Change L2T (length to t
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code licensing.
What myth? The myth t
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
[NET_SCHED]: Making rate table lookups more flexible. Extend the
tc_ratespec struct, with two parameters: 1) "cell_align" that allow
adjusting the alignment of the rate table. 2) "overhead" that allow
adding a packet ov
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc4/2.6.23-rc4-mm1/
Got these on an i386 build with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y ...
WARNING: "div64_64" [net/netfilter/xt_connbytes.ko] has no CRC!
WARNING: "div64_64" [net/ipv4/tcp_cubi
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:27:03PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
>
On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:54:57PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > > > Th
On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > > This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code
> > > > l
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:54:57PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > > This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> If OpenBSD wants a world where code must be returned
OpenBSD does not want this.
OpenBSD wants a world where people do things because they are the
right thing to do.
OpenBSD lets you decide; it doesn't dictate.
someone poo-poos your d
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code licensing.
> >
> > What myth? The myth that Theo understands dual lic
John W. Linville napsal(a):
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:00:09PM -0400, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> ath5k, use int as retval
>>
>> Convert some functions to return int and proper negative return value on
>> error as we are used to.
>
> Since I didn't apply 1/5, this one didn't apply either. It seems
> f
> It is illegal to modify a license unless you are the owner/author,
> because it is a legal document. If there are multiple owners/authors,
Oh dear - Theo, go talk to a lawyer, or do a course on licencing.
The owner generally starts with the rights to control who performs acts
covered by copyri
On 8/20/07, Moni Shoua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch series is the fourth version (see below link to V3) of the
> suggested changes to the bonding driver so it would be able to support
> non ARPHRD_ETHER netdevices for its High-Availability (active-backup) mode.
>
> The motivation is to e
if the table is always fixed size with MAX_LINKS entries, why not use a
statically
allocated table straightforwardly?
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netl
with the macro max provided by , so changed its name to a more
proper one: limit
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
ind
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 5681ce3..8bb14e3 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -
This is what happened today:
Sep 1 21:08:01 frege NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
frege ~ # uname -r
2.6.22.5-cfs-v20.5
2007/8/16, Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (please do not remove the netdev Cc:)
>
> Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [...]
> > If it does not work I'l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:58:22PM -0700
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc4/2.6.23-rc4-mm1/
On this machine (Athlon 64 X2 4600, 4 GiB memory, lots of disks),
2.6.23-rc1-mm2 runs fine. 2.6.
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 06:38:23PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Athanasius wrote:
> > I'll compile up a new kernel, likely 2.6.22.6, plus this patch, and
> >reboot to it tonight. I still don't know *exactly* how to trigger the
> >bug on demand though, it's not reocurred since I posted the bug
On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code licensing.
>
> What myth? The myth that Theo understands dual licensing?
Reyk's code was never dual licensed, so it's not like it even matters
to
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code licensing.
What myth? The myth that Theo understands dual licensing?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mo
This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code licensing.
C.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 31-Aug-2007 21:40
Subject: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bcc'd to Eben Moglen so that people don
This is a resend of the iproute VLAN patch with the if_link.h changes
edited out since the headers are already synced.
[IPROUTE]: VLAN support
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
commit 90727b2bf5b4a7ef9d0638ca80206083b965a0b5
tree 173722acd855b7fe1eb1a5f22cf7706814f72c8f
par
Athanasius wrote:
I'll compile up a new kernel, likely 2.6.22.6, plus this patch, and
reboot to it tonight. I still don't know *exactly* how to trigger the
bug on demand though, it's not reocurred since I posted the bug report
(but had happened about a week before as well).
Thanks. I'm not
> > This patch fixes unbalanced parenthesis.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > drivers/net/skge.h |2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1-a/drivers/net/skge.h 2007-09-01
> > 07:23:52.0 +0
Meelis Roos wrote:
>>I'm guessing that its ICMP errors containing UDP fragments.
>>
>>Could you add a WARN_ON(1) to ipv4_get_l4proto() in
>>net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c to verify
>>this?
>
>
> Yes, it seems to be an ICMP error:
>
> WARNING: at net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 05:47:23 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Am seeing random crap like this:
> >
> > Aug 31 20:57:46 sony dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on eth1 to 255.255.255.255 port
> > 67
> > Aug 31 20:57:51 sony dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on eth1 to 255.255.255.2
> I'm guessing that its ICMP errors containing UDP fragments.
>
> Could you add a WARN_ON(1) to ipv4_get_l4proto() in
> net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c to verify
> this?
Yes, it seems to be an ICMP error:
WARNING: at net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c:93 ipv4_get_l4pro
Hi there,
I've already sent this email to lkml (see
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/13/1144) and got no feedback so far. I was
told that netdev might be a more appropriate list, so here I am!
I wrote a small C program using the BSD socket API to send a UDP
broadcast packet to all interfaces on my
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:47:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >Aug 31 20:58:07 sony kernel: ipw2200: Firmware error detected. Restarting.
> I see this on my Sony Vaio with older, non-mm kernels too. Incredibly
> frustrating, as it seems to be related to the phase of the
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 06:44:06AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > > > while (1) {
> > > > printf("%*s%s ", indent - 1, "", menu->prompt->text);
> > > > + switch (sym->maturity) {
> > > > + case M_
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:12:41 +0200
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >>
> Why does this add a new ip subcommand instead and uses genetlink
> instead of the rtnl_link API, which
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 08:10:12 +0200
Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch fixes unbalanced parenthesis.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> drivers/net/skge.h |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-2
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 06:44:06AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > > while (1) {
> > > printf("%*s%s ", indent - 1, "", menu->prompt->text);
> > > + switch (sym->maturity) {
> > > + case M_EXPERIMENTAL:
> > > + printf("(EXPERIMENTAL) ");
> > > +
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:53:53 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I met 2 troubles while I compiled rc4-mm1 on x86/UP system,
One on pcnet32.c (patch is attaced below).
One on crypto CONFIG.
== compile log ==
drivers/net/pcnet32.c: In function 'pcnet32_netif_st
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:05:57 +0100 Simon Arlott wrote:
> > What about something like this? I'm not sure if the addition to
> > sym_init is desirable... I also had to prefix _ to the name for
> > now otherwise it conflicts badly with the current symbols.
- Message d'origine -
De: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:50:03 -0400
Sujet: Re: Re: pktgen terminating condition
>I dont know if you followed the discussion - by defering the freeing of
>skbs, you will be slowing down socket apps sending from the local
>machine. It may
Hi All!
I found another bugs in HTB
1. HTB Wrong calculate LEVELS.
- try run "./create_nodes.sh" in archive and do "tc -d class show dev eth0"
Hm.. i read
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/theory.htm
I understand that if Level calculation broken - HTB wrong work! I try
to see sch_htb.
Andrew Morton wrote:
Am seeing random crap like this:
Aug 31 20:57:46 sony dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on eth1 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
Aug 31 20:57:51 sony dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on eth1 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
Aug 31 20:57:56 sony dhclient: dhclient(4537) is already running - exiting.
Aug 31 20
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 21:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Am seeing random crap like this:
> Aug 31 20:58:07 sony kernel: ipw2200: Firmware error detected. Restarting.
> Aug 31 21:01:31 sony kernel: ipw2200: Firmware error detected. Restarting.
> when trying to use ssh on the current rc4-mm1 l
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 11:58:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > crypto/built-in.o: In function `update2':
> > digest.c:(.text+0x94a): undefined reference to `crypto_km_types'
> > digest.c:(.text+0x9bf): undefined reference to `crypto_km_types'
> >
> > digest.c (CONFIG_CRYPTO) uses crypto/sca
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
When CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is enabled, tc_classify() is called twice in
prio_classify(). This causes "interesting" behaviour: with the setup
below, packets are duplicated, sent twice to ifb0, and then loop in and
out of ifb0.
The patch uses the previously
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Why does this add a new ip subcommand instead and uses genetlink
instead of the rtnl_link API, which was introduced exactly for
this stuff?
Hm... It does not, it just adds a parser for veth commands tha
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
commit ac093f5c2f1160ece72a6fef5c779c1892fc3152
Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri Aug 31 11:53:35 2007 +0200
[NET_SCHED]: Making rate table lookups more flexible. Extend the
tc_ratespec struct, with two parameters: 1) "cell_alig
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
commit 6fdc0f061be94f5e297650961360fb7a9d1cc85d
Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Aug 30 17:53:42 2007 +0200
[NET_SCHED]: Make all rate based scheduler work with TSO.
Change L2T (length to time) macros, in all rate based sc
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:53:53 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I met 2 troubles while I compiled rc4-mm1 on x86/UP system,
>
> One on pcnet32.c (patch is attaced below).
> One on crypto CONFIG.
>
> == compile log ==
> drivers/net/pcnet32.c: In function 'pcnet32_netif_stop':
>
91 matches
Mail list logo
