This is the patch to support IPv6 over IPv4 IPsec
Signed-off-by: Miika Komu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Diego Beltrami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Kazunori Miyazawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_tunnel.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_tunnel.c
index e23c21d..e54c549 1
This patch exports xfrm_state_afinfo.
Signed-off-by: Miika Komu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Diego Beltrami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Kazunori Miyazawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index e476541..bf91d63 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
++
This is the patch to support IPv4 over IPv6 IPsec.
Signed-off-by: Miika Komu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Diego Beltrami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Kazunori Miyazawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
index fb9f69c..011136a 100644
---
Hello,
I fixed the compile issue when we configure IPv6 as a module.
[1/3] exporting xfrm_state_afinfo
[2/3] supporting IPv6 over IPv4 IPsec
[3/3] supporting IPv4 over IPv6 IPsec
These patches can be applied to linux-2.6.20-rc2.
Thank you,
--
Kazunori Miyazawa
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 21:09 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:44:12 +1100
>
> > I stumbled accross what might be a bug on out of order architecture:
> >
> > netif_poll_enable() only does a clear_bit(). However,
> > netif_poll
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:44:12 +1100
> I stumbled accross what might be a bug on out of order architecture:
>
> netif_poll_enable() only does a clear_bit(). However,
> netif_poll_disable/enable pairs are often used as simili-spinlocks.
>
> (netif
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:07:24 +1100
> tg3 says
>
> tg3: eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex.
> tg3: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX.
>
> but sungem says
>
> eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full-duplex.
> eth0: Pause is disab
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, jamal wrote:
On Wed, 2006-27-12 at 09:09 +0200, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
My scenario is treatment of RTP packets in kernel space with a single network
card (both Rx and Tx). The default of the Intel 5000 series chipset is
affinity of each
network card to a certain CPU
On Dec 21, 2006, at 22:07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Hi Andy !
I've been looking at porting various drivers (EMAC, sungem,
spider_net, ...) to the generic PHY stuff. However, I have one
significant problem here.
One of the things I've been trying to do lately with EMAC and that I
plan to
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly
involve
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19
with patches available
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any othe
Re-sending as a plain text to reach netdev.
Sorry for the extra traffic, please ignore the earlier html version of
this e-mail...
Jeff/Roland/all,
What is the preferred submission driver model for an iWARP-capable
Ethernet NIC -
> Great! At last glance, only gianfar, fs_enet, and au1000_eth. There
> are one or two others that haven't gone in, yet. My hope is that
> your changes will not require any changes to the drivers, but I'll
> leave that to your discretion.
Unfortunately, it will probably have an impact on
* Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Generic event handling mechanism.
it would be /very/ helpful to state against which kernel tree the
patch-queue is. It does not apply to 2.6.20-rc1 nor to -rc2 nor to
2.6.19. At which point i gave up ...
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this l
* Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Generic event handling mechanism.
i see it covers alot of event sources, but i cannot see block IO
notifications. Am i missing something?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 08:16:10AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
...
> The system hangs and does not recover (well, a few processes
> continue on the other processor for a few minutes before they
> too deadlock...)
>
> I am guessing this problem has been around for a while, but it
> is only triggered w
On 22-12-2006 15:28, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> hi,
>
> while running my usual stuff on 2.6.20-rc1-git5, sfuzz
> (http://www.digitaldwarf.be/products/sfuzz.c)
> did the following, to produce the lockdep warning below:
...
> Here is the stacktrace:
>
> [ 313.239556] ===
From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[patch] qeth: fix uaccess handling and get rid of unused variable
drivers/s390/net/qeth_main.c: In function `qeth_process_inbound_buffer':
drivers/s390/net/qeth_main.c:2563: warning: unused variable `vlan_addr'
include/asm/uaccess.h: In function `qeth_do_
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 12:45:50PM -0800, Ulrich Drepper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > Why do we want to inject _ready_ event, when it is possible to mark
> > event as ready and wakeup thread parked in syscall?
>
> Going back to this old one:
>
> How do you want to mar
19 matches
Mail list logo
