This is a discussion about Brian's SECOND PATCH which needs
fixups.
Please forget about the second patch, optimizing this code path isn't
worth it if the -1 trick doesn't work in all cases.
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:07:05PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Please _don't_ remove CCs.
Sorry, I was sending via the gmane web interface, I guess it doesn't
honour CCs.
This one's via muttng's NNTP support to gmane, so I _think_ it's going
to the right places.
> On Saturday 11 November 2006
--- Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can use netchannels, which were designed for
> exactly that kind of
> load.
Actually, netchannels are a mechanism I've been
looking at intensely, as a way to simplify this and
keep it sane, without loosing performance.
> You need to process s
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Generic event handling mechanism.
[...]
Sorry for the delay again. Kernel work is simply not my highest priority.
I've collected my comments on some parts of the patch. I haven't gone
through every part of the patch yet. Sorry for the length.
===
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006, David Miller wrote:
> From: Brian Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:32:18 -0500
>
> > Al Viro wrote:
> > > AFAICS, the rules are:
> > >
> > > (1) checksum is 16-bit one's complement of the one's complement sum of
> > > relevant 16bit words.
> > >
> > >
Signals which were requested to be delivered through kevent
subsystem must be registered through usual signal() and others
syscalls, this option allows alternative delivery.
With KEVENT_SIGNAL_NOMASK flag being set in kevent for set of
signals, they will not be delivered in a usual way.
Kevents fo
Venkat Yekkirala wrote:
This patchset is against davem's net-2.6.git. Please apply to 2.6.19.
The following are the changes since the previous post of this patchset:
1. Separate BUG_ON usage per Eric's suggestion.
2. Replace security_sid_compare with a simple sid compare check per
a suggest
Please _don't_ remove CCs.
On Saturday 11 November 2006 07:32, Paul Hampson wrote:
> Michael Buesch bu3sch.de> writes:
>
> > On Thursday 09 November 2006 23:23, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > > I've been backporting the bcm43xx-d80211 driver to whatever the released
> > > 2.6 kernel was using the rt2x0
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 09:34:33AM -0800, Jonathan Day ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > > First of all, is it possible (and/or "reasonable
> > > practice") when developing a network driver to do
> > > zero-copy transfers between main memory and the
> > > network device?
> >
> > What do you mean?
>
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:15:14 -0800 (PST)
> Please consider pulling following changesets from
> "2.6.19-rc5-net-2.6.20-20061110-to-davem" branch at:
> git://git.linux-ipv6.org/gitroot/yoshfuji/linux-2.6-dev.git
>
> Regards,
>
> HEADLINES
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
