On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 06:06:48PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:56:29PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> This will break the compile for !NUMA if someone ends up doing a bisect
> and lands here as a bisect point.
>
> You introduce this nice wrapper..
The dev_to_node w
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 06:06:48PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:56:29PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> This will break the compile for !NUMA if someone ends up doing a bisect
> and lands here as a bisect point.
>
> You introduce this nice wrapper..
Yes, I'm stupid :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> uli526x: uli526x_init_one() 0
> ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:12.0[A]->GFI 20(level,low)->IRQ 50
> uli526x: I/O base is zero
The PCI base address register used by the device is not set. Weird.
It may be that the driver does not use the adequate BAR (
Hi Stephen,
I don't know if you received my mail since I got no reply.
Thanks in advance for your comments,
Willy
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 10:57:07PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> In my own kernels, I've added your backport of SKGE to 2.4 that I found
> here :
>
>http://deve
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While you're at it .. CBQ is actually not a very good alternative
> since it doesn't work properly on top of virtual network devices.
> The closest match for an alternative would be TBF, but HTB and
> HFSC also do fine. Maybe just point to the traffic sc
endif comments should match their corresponding if(n)defs.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/gianfar_mii.h |2 +-
drivers/net/sk98lin/h/skgei2c.h |2 +-
drivers/net/sk98lin/h/ski2c.h |2 +-
drivers/net/skfp/h/targe
SoftMAC contains a number of debug-type messages that continue to print
even when debugging is turned off. This patch substitutes dprintkl for
printkl for those lines.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Index: wireless-2.6/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_auth.c
==
jamal wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-11 at 09:29 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
You can ofcourse add many of these based on other header info.
It seems to me your magic header is inside the UDP packet, correct?
In that case you will have to play with matches since you can specify
arbitraty offsets and v
I've got a rather awkward debugging situation.
I helped a friend in another city set up a dual-boot Linux/Windows box
a while ago, and it just got a motherboard upgrade. Unfortunately, I
had followed my usual instincts and built a custom kernel which didn't
include the new motherboard's drivers.
On Sat, 2006-04-11 at 09:29 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> jamal wrote:
> Please do send a script. I match based on this method below. Probably
> you only
> need the part that checks for the MAGIC,
What i do in my case is send to the SUT to UDP port 9. The SUT loops
back the packet to me afte
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 07:49:16PM +0100, Oleg Verych ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [ Please do not answer just to answer, cc list is big, no one from ]
> [ The Big Jury seems to care. (well, Jonathan does, but he wasn't in cc) ]
>
> Friendly, Oleg.
Just in case some misunderstanding happend
jamal wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 11:11 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
I'd be thrilled to have the receive logic go into pktgen, even if
it was #if 0 with a comment
showing how to patch dev.c to get it working. It would make my
out-of-tree patch smaller
and should help others who are doing res
Jouni Malinen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:45:46AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 23:46 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
Has anyone used this patch, particularly with WPA encryption? When I try it, wpa_supplicant
immediately uses 90+% of the cpu and never actually authenticate
On 11/4/06, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Udayan Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to understand the code of d80211 (thanks to James Ketrenos
> for the info he provided) and also work in it.
>
> I found that I can get the latest patches regarding the same from :
>
> http://www.kernel.org/
On Sat, 2006-04-11 at 14:32 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Some messages were in flight yesterday... (I even received a copy of them :) )
>
Ok, it seems this is happening to me on another list as well. So not
just netdev. My ISP is at it again.
I got your email CCed to me but not the one echoed
jamal a écrit :
I am browsing through my local netdev archive and dont see anything
posted since Nov/02.
Well, according to
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&r=1&b=200611&w=1
Some messages were in flight yesterday... (I even received a copy of them :) )
Eric
-
To unsubscribe fr
I am browsing through my local netdev archive and dont see anything
posted since Nov/02.
Last message was:
--
From:
Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
netdev
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 11:11 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> I'd be thrilled to have the receive logic go into pktgen, even if
> it was #if 0 with a comment
> showing how to patch dev.c to get it working. It would make my
> out-of-tree patch smaller
> and should help others who are doing research and
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 07:49:16PM +0100, Oleg Verych ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > applications can be found on project's homepage.
> > There is a link to archive there, where you can find plenty of sources.
>
> But no single makefile. Or what CC and options do not mater really?
> You can easily
19 matches
Mail list logo
