Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipg: redundancy with mii.h

2006-05-22 Thread jesse\(建興\)
Dear All: I had tested the following patch of IP1000A http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/20060521-2.6.17-rc4-git-ip1000-test.patch It works fine. We will discuss this driver with our members see if there are anything need to add or modify. Thanks for everybody's effort for our IP1000A.

Re: How to submit a new module to linux kernel?

2006-05-22 Thread Ian McDonald
On 5/23/06, Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:18:12PM +0800, #ZHOU BIN# wrote: > I'm new in this mailing list. I implemented a new TCP congestion > control module for linux kernel 2.6.16.13. > Does anybody know how to apply for the integration of it into the > linux

Re: Via Velocity minimum MTU size

2006-05-22 Thread Francois Romieu
Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > Can someone please explain why the driver might constrain the NIC to a > minimum MTU size of 1500? None that I remember of. The driver suffered some breakage when changing the mtu while the interface is up but it has been fixed since february (i.e. way bef

Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)

2006-05-22 Thread Vlad Yasevich
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 00:21 +0400, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote: > Replying to Vlad Yasevich: > > /* This is only to work around buggy Windows95/2000 > > * VJ compression implementations. If the ID field > > * does not change, they drop every other packet in > > * a TCP stream using

Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)

2006-05-22 Thread Rick Jones
Alan Cox wrote: On Llu, 2006-05-22 at 11:48 -0700, Rick Jones wrote: ID of zero again? I thought that went away years ago? Anyway, given the number of "helpful" devices out there willing to clear the DF bit, fragment and forward, perhaps always setting the IP ID to 0, even if DF is set, isn

Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)

2006-05-22 Thread Alan Cox
On Llu, 2006-05-22 at 11:48 -0700, Rick Jones wrote: > ID of zero again? I thought that went away years ago? Anyway, given > the number of "helpful" devices out there willing to clear the DF bit, > fragment and forward, perhaps always setting the IP ID to 0, even if DF > is set, isn't such a g

Re: wireless-dev updated

2006-05-22 Thread Jiri Benc
Mon, 22 May 2006 15:55:50 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:42:14PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > > This patch is wrong, it uses incorrect ioctl number (collides with > > userspace MLME). > > Since you had posted that in the same thread, I had presumed that > you had accounte

Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)

2006-05-22 Thread Paul P Komkoff Jr
Replying to Vlad Yasevich: > /* This is only to work around buggy Windows95/2000 > * VJ compression implementations. If the ID field > * does not change, they drop every other packet in > * a TCP stream using header compression. > */ Unfortunately, cisco IOS also complains

Re: wireless-dev updated

2006-05-22 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:42:14PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:15:54 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > Jiri Benc: > > d80211: switching management interface on/off > > This patch is wrong, it uses incorrect ioctl number (collides with > userspace MLME). Since you had p

Please pull 'upstream-fixes' branch of wireless-2.6

2006-05-22 Thread John W. Linville
The following changes since commit 353b28bafd1b962359a866ff263a7fad833d29a1: David S. Miller: [SPARC]: Add robust futex syscall entries. are found in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git upstream-fixes Florin Malita: or

Please pull 'upstream' branch of wireless-2.6

2006-05-22 Thread John W. Linville
The following changes since commit 01d654d25d23fb73deb7904ce1c0b3a0f5fc2908: John W. Linville: Merge branch 'upstream-fixes' into upstream are found in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git upstream Marcin Juszkiewicz: h

[PATCH] sky2: fix jumbo packet support

2006-05-22 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The truncate threshold calculation to prevent receiver from getting stuck was incorrect, and it didn't take into account the upper limit on bits in the register so the jumbo packet support was broken. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- sky2.orig/drivers/net/sky2.c +++ sky2/dr

Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)

2006-05-22 Thread Vlad Yasevich
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 11:48 -0700, Rick Jones wrote: > > IP id is set to 0 on unconnected sockets when the DF bit is set (path > > mtu discovery is enabled). Try issuing a connect() in your application > > and see if the ids are increasing again. > > ID of zero again? I thought that went away ye

Re: netlink vs. debugfs (was Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure)

2006-05-22 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:04:00AM +0530, Balbir Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Anybody else want to take a shot in comparing the two? Netlink is always presented in the kernel, so no need to make additional dependencies for special FS. But number of netlink sockets is not that big, so use ne

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17] tg3: Add some missing rx error counters

2006-05-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Michael Chan wrote: Add some missing rx error counters for 5705 and newer chips. Update version to 3.58. Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/drivers/net/tg3.c b/drivers/net/tg3.c index e1b33a2..49ad60b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tg3.c +++ b/drivers/net/tg3.c @@ -69,8 +6

Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)

2006-05-22 Thread Rick Jones
IP id is set to 0 on unconnected sockets when the DF bit is set (path mtu discovery is enabled). Try issuing a connect() in your application and see if the ids are increasing again. ID of zero again? I thought that went away years ago? Anyway, given the number of "helpful" devices out there

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17 1/2] bnx2: Fix bug in bnx2_nvram_write()

2006-05-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Michael Chan wrote: Fix a bug in bnx2_nvram_write() caused by a counter variable not correctly incremented by 4. Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ACK patches 1-2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] M

[PATCH 2.6.17 1/2] bnx2: Fix bug in bnx2_nvram_write()

2006-05-22 Thread Michael Chan
Fix a bug in bnx2_nvram_write() caused by a counter variable not correctly incremented by 4. Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c index 5ca99e2..509f104 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c +++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.c @@ -3061,7 +3061,7 @@

[PATCH 2.6.17 2/2] bnx2: Use kmalloc instead of array

2006-05-22 Thread Michael Chan
Use kmalloc() instead of a local array in bnx2_nvram_write(). Update version to 1.4.40. Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c index 509f104..54161ae 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c +++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.c @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ #defi

Re: skge driver oops

2006-05-22 Thread Beschorner Daniel
Thank you for the hint, Krzysztof! But this switch doesn't help, the problem for the crash is in my case the rx side. I can send big files over the card, as soon as I start receiving the box crashes with the oopses you can find in former postings. Daniel > On Wed, 17 May 2006, Beschorner Daniel

Re: netlink vs. debugfs (was Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure)

2006-05-22 Thread Balbir Singh
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:09:22AM -0700, Tim Bird wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Martin Peschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My patch series is a proposal for a generic implementation of statistics. > > > > This uses debugfs for the user interface, but the > > per-task-delay-accounting-*.pa

[PATCH 2.6.17] tg3: Add some missing rx error counters

2006-05-22 Thread Michael Chan
Add some missing rx error counters for 5705 and newer chips. Update version to 3.58. Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/drivers/net/tg3.c b/drivers/net/tg3.c index e1b33a2..49ad60b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tg3.c +++ b/drivers/net/tg3.c @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ #define DRV_

Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)

2006-05-22 Thread Vlad Yasevich
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 14:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Paul P Komkoff Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I have a userspace application, which talks WCCP2 with cisco routers. > > It sends and receives UDP packets on port 2048. After I've updated my > > server to 2.6.16, it sto

[Netchannel] Full TCP receiving support.

2006-05-22 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
Hello, developers. Attached patch implements full TCP input processing for netchannels [1]. It is based on socket processing code and is fairly hairy for now. Main idea is to queue skbs into netchannels private queue in interrupt time and then remove skbs and process them in process' context. To m

Re: How to submit a new module to linux kernel?

2006-05-22 Thread Erik Mouw
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:18:12PM +0800, #ZHOU BIN# wrote: > I'm new in this mailing list. I implemented a new TCP congestion > control module for linux kernel 2.6.16.13. > Does anybody know how to apply for the integration of it into the > linux kernel? How long will this process take? See Docum

Re: Routing header reversal in Linux kernel

2006-05-22 Thread Sérgio Gomes
OK, I've simplified the problem greatly, please ignore my previous post. I am no longer using the backdoor and I am following the RFC by using an authentication header between both machines. This, in theory, should allow for routing header reversal, i.e., when I send a packet from one machine wi

Routing header reversal in Linux kernel

2006-05-22 Thread Sérgio Gomes
Greetings! I am a final year student in Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal, and part of my final project requires the use of IPv6 routing headers. In particular, I need the route reversal to work. Now, as it didn't, I began analysing the source code, and found a comment, stating that i

Re: How to submit a new module to linux kernel?

2006-05-22 Thread James Morris
On Mon, 22 May 2006, #ZHOU BIN# wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new in this mailing list. I implemented a new TCP congestion control > module for linux kernel 2.6.16.13. > Does anybody know how to apply for the integration of it into the linux > kernel? How long will this process take? Read Documenta

Re: [git patches] net driver updates

2006-05-22 Thread Andi Kleen
> I don't have any good ideas, please try to figure out what's wrong. Is > there a debug switch for the network layer that forces the network layer > to verify the CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY blocks? > Good news. The latest -git driver seems to fix the problem. So maybe something got broken with the

Re: wireless-dev updated

2006-05-22 Thread Jiri Benc
On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:15:54 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > Jiri Benc: > d80211: switching management interface on/off This patch is wrong, it uses incorrect ioctl number (collides with userspace MLME). As I discovered some bugs and I'm still working on some of them, I haven't sent pull r

How to submit a new module to linux kernel?

2006-05-22 Thread #ZHOU BIN#
Hi all, I'm new in this mailing list. I implemented a new TCP congestion control module for linux kernel 2.6.16.13. Does anybody know how to apply for the integration of it into the linux kernel? How long will this process take? Thank you very much. Best Regards, Zhou Bin - To unsubscribe from