Re: Netchannel subsystem update.

2006-05-21 Thread David S. Miller
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 19:52:02 +0400 > While developing first apporoach I've found that input TCP processing > sometimes refers to dst_entry which can only be obtained through the input > routing code. You can find appropriate changes in attached increm

[CFT] CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED [was Re: [PATCH] Disable multipath cache routing ]

2006-05-21 Thread Ravikiran G Thirumalai
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 01:51:45PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > ... > Anyhow, the code as-is hasn't been maintained for a long time except > for a few minor blips (I'm using hg's annotate to find those and have > included those people on the cc' list as presumably there are using > these features

[PATCH] secmark: disable new controls for SELinux by default

2006-05-21 Thread James Morris
This should address the issue of people tripping over the new secmark controls when upgrading their kernel before the userland components are available. With this patch, the new secmark controls for SElinux are now disabled by default, so existing behavior is entirely preserved, and the user is

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipg: redundancy with mii.h

2006-05-21 Thread jesse\(建興\)
Hi Francois: Thanks for your help. I will try this patch and test it. http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/20060521-2.6.17-rc4-git-ip1000-test.patch Jesse - Original Message - From: "Francois Romieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Vrabel" <[EMAIL

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] SECMARK 2.0

2006-05-21 Thread James Morris
On Sun, 21 May 2006, James Morris wrote: > > And I'd agree with the other commenters: if these features are compulsory > > for SELinux then we might as well just `select' them. Right now it's way > > too hard. > > Ok, I'll look into selecting them. There are several problems with this. Because

Via Velocity minimum MTU size

2006-05-21 Thread Jay Cliburn
Hello, I was advised by someone on the fedora-devel-list to post my question here. I'm trying to set the MTU size on my Via Velocity 6122 Gbit adapter from the default of 1500 down to 1492, but I keep getting this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ifconfig eth0 mtu 1492 SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] SECMARK 2.0

2006-05-21 Thread James Morris
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > Well as discussed off-list, I'm not able to get this stuff to work. I get > a pile of these: > > security_compute_av: unrecognized class 57 This is because the userspace components have not been updated yet -- the patch just went into -mm. The work

RE: [PATCH] Gianfar SKB Recycling Support

2006-05-21 Thread Haruki Dai-r35557
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 2:48 AM > To: Haruki Dai-r35557 > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Fleming Andy-afleming; Kumar > Gala; Haruki Dai-r35557 > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Gianfar SKB Recycling Support > > On Wed, 17

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] SECMARK 2.0

2006-05-21 Thread Andrew Morton
James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The following patchset is an updated version of secmark, which I'd like to > propose for inclusion in either Dave or Andrew's tree for subsequent merge > into mainline during the 2.6.18 merge window. Well as discussed off-list, I'm not able to get th

Re: [git patches] net driver updates

2006-05-21 Thread Manfred Spraul
Andreas Kleen wrote: No idea, but unlikely. The fix removes a duplicate request_irq call. Is it possible that the both instances run concurrently? The system has two Forcedeth ports, but only one has a cable connected. I don't think there is any parallelism. Just one connection with a lot

Re: [git patches] net driver updates

2006-05-21 Thread Andreas Kleen
> No idea, but unlikely. The fix removes a duplicate request_irq call. > Is > it possible that the both instances run concurrently? The system has two Forcedeth ports, but only one has a cable connected. I don't think there is any parallelism. Just one connection with a lot of data. It didn't hap

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipg: redundancy with mii.h

2006-05-21 Thread Francois Romieu
inux-2.6.git (please include the '-p' option in future invocation of diff) I have put an updated patch against 2.6.17-rc4 for the whole driver at http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/20060521-2.6.17-rc4-git-ip1000-test.patch -- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipg: redundancy with mii.h

2006-05-21 Thread Pekka Enberg
Hi David, On 5/21/06, David Vrabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Did anyone manage to get a response from IC Plus regarding the required Signed-off-by line? The current IP1000A driver maintainer at IC Plus is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have no received confirmation if he can sign off or not yet.

Re: [git patches] net driver updates

2006-05-21 Thread Manfred Spraul
Andi Kleen wrote: My NF4Pro machine now reliably does Disconnecting: Bad packet length 3742984839. when I display a lot of data through ssh. Apparently it generates some corruption that's not caught by the TCP checksum. The nic does hw checksumming - thus the tcp checksum won't catch drive