On Saturday 20 May 2006 19:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 20 May 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Andrew Morton:
> > > >revert "forcedeth: fix multi irq issues"
> > >
> >
Paul P Komkoff Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I have a userspace application, which talks WCCP2 with cisco routers.
> It sends and receives UDP packets on port 2048. After I've updated my
> server to 2.6.16, it stopped working.
>
> Examining logs and packet dumps of previous (2.6.15
Apologies for the (very) late response.
0007-ipg-plug-leaks-in-the-error-path-of-ipg_nic_open.txt broke receive
since it was skipping the initialization of the Rx buffers. Patch attached.
Did anyone manage to get a response from IC Plus regarding the required
Signed-off-by line?
David Vrab
(cc' list exploded to include various people who might not be reading
netdev, sorry about that)
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 03:11:20PM +0530, pravin b shelar wrote:
> I am working on Linux multipath networking and I will like to fix
> bugs related to equal cost multipath caching support.
My expe
- Forwarded message from Paul P Komkoff Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Paul P Komkoff Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Subject: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more
specifically, WCCP?)
Hello!
I have a userspace application, which talks W
On Monday 15 May 2006 06:27, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Sunday 14 May 2006 08:57, Ayaz Abdulla wrote:
> > Alistair John Strachan wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > There's been just a single commit since -rc3:
> > >
> > > forcedeth: fix multi irq issues
> > > ebf34c9b6fcd22338ef764b039b3ac55ed0e297b
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 20 May 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Andrew Morton:
> > >revert "forcedeth: fix multi irq issues"
> >
> > Manfred just found the fix for this, so we should no longer need to reve
On Sat, 20 May 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Morton:
> >revert "forcedeth: fix multi irq issues"
>
> Manfred just found the fix for this, so we should no longer need to revert.
Hmm. I already pulled. I guess we can revert the revert a
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton:
>revert "forcedeth: fix multi irq issues"
Manfred just found the fix for this, so we should no longer need to revert.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The more I think about TCP processing in netchannels, the more I get
close to the following ideas:
* map netchannel to socket.
* implement own TCP (receiving for now) state machine.
So I would like to ask people, what do we want for netchannels
* existing Linux TCP stack
* fairly simple mi
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
Apparently IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED isn't entirely safe to use and
will oops the kernel "sooner or later". The Kconfig comment says
EXPERIMENTAL but it's not.
Let's go further and mark it BROKEN for now (leaving the comment as-is
though). If nobody steps up to resurrect
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> On Friday 19 May 2006 12:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Friday 19 May 2006 04:25, Brice Goglin wrote:
>>>
>>>
dev_mc_upload() from net/core/dev_mcast.c does
spin_lock_bh(&dev->xmit_lock);
__dev_mc_upload(
12 matches
Mail list logo
