Re: [PATCH] softmac: don't send out packets while scanning

2006-04-08 Thread Herbert Xu
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, thanks. I had realised that a while later but it was too late. > Note that this blows up for me anyway so don't apply: > > [ 416.448315] SoftMAC: Start scanning with channel: 1 > [ 416.448331] SoftMAC: Scanning 14 channels > [ 416.495245] NETD

[PATCH wireless-dev] Move d80211-based drivers into new subdirectory

2006-04-08 Thread Jouni Malinen
Move rt2x00 and bcm43xx-d80211 drivers into a new drivers/net/wireless/d80211 subdirectory. This directory is used for collecting wireless LAN drivers that use the Devicescape IEEE 802.11 stack (net/d80211). After applying this patch file, the existing directories must be moved with following comm

[PATCH wireless-dev] d80211: Replace MODULE_PARM with module_param

2006-04-08 Thread Jouni Malinen
MODULE_PARM macro was removed and this broke net/d80211 build. Fix this by using module_param instead of MODULE_PARM. Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: wireless-dev/net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c === --- wireless

Re: 2.4.32: unresolved symbol unregister_qdisc

2006-04-08 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 19:18:47 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote: > Yeah, this module is unfortunately not under the GPL, it was made for > research and i am not the author, I was only given the code for my own > research. > > I enabled that support in the kernel, and then tried to recompile and g

Re: 2.4.32: unresolved symbol unregister_qdisc

2006-04-08 Thread George P Nychis
Yeah, this module is unfortunately not under the GPL, it was made for research and i am not the author, I was only given the code for my own research. I enabled that support in the kernel, and then tried to recompile and get tons of errors/warnings... so maybe I am missing something else to be e

Re: 2.4.32: unresolved symbol unregister_qdisc

2006-04-08 Thread David S. Miller
From: "George P Nychis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 18:47:34 -0400 (EDT) > Hey, > > I have a kernel module that uses unregister_qdisc and register_qdisc, > whenever i try to insert the module I get: > /lib/modules/2.4.32/kernel/net/sched/sch_xcp.o: > /lib/modules/2.4.32/kernel/net

Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6354] New: NULL Pointer lapbether

2006-04-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Begin forwarded message: Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 08:11:18 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6354] New: NULL Pointer lapbether http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6354 Summary: NULL Pointer lapbether Kernel Version: 2.6.14 2.6.15

Re: [PATCH] softmac: don't send out packets while scanning

2006-04-08 Thread Johannes Berg
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 13:33 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Please use netif_wake_queue as otherwise packets can get stuck for quite > a while. Yeah, thanks. I had realised that a while later but it was too late. Note that this blows up for me anyway so don't apply: [ 416.448315] SoftMAC: Start scan

Re: [PATCH 17/21] orinoco_pci: use pci_iomap() for resources

2006-04-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Pavel Roskin wrote: Quoting Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Is there a reason why dev->mem_{start/end} should not be removed ? Is there a reason why it should? Is it going to be obsolete? It is slowly obsoleting for a few years (don't laugh...). It is preferred to store the relevant addre

Re: Broadcast ARP packets on link local addresses (Version2).

2006-04-08 Thread jamal
On Sat, 2006-08-04 at 13:27 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > I like the idea of allowing user-space to control what addresses cause > broadcasts. However, I'm uncomfortable with overloading existing flags > even though they might appear to fit the bill on the face of it. > > People may be using this fo

Re: [patch] ipv4: initialize arp_tbl rw lock

2006-04-08 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 03:14:04AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > Perhaps fs_initcall() would work better. Or if that causes > problems we could create a net_initcall() that sits between > fs_initcall() and device_initcall(). fs_initcall() seems to be used mainly for "init after subsystem" stu

Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6349] New: iptables DNAT returns unknown error 4294967295

2006-04-08 Thread Patrick McHardy
Patrick McHardy wrote: > Please try if this patch helps. > > + .hooks = 1 << NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING || 1 << NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT, I shouldn't send patches before getting out of bed .. :) Please try this one instead. [NETFILTER]: Fix DNAT in LOCAL_OUT Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL P

Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6349] New: iptables DNAT returns unknown error 4294967295

2006-04-08 Thread Patrick McHardy
Andrew Morton wrote: > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 06:12:07 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6349] New: iptables DNAT returns unknown error > 4294967295 > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6349 > >

Re: [patch] ipv4: initialize arp_tbl rw lock

2006-04-08 Thread Heiko Carstens
> We could make inet_init() a subsystem init but I vaguely recall > that we were doing that at one point and it broke things for > some reason. > > Perhaps fs_initcall() would work better. Or if that causes > problems we could create a net_initcall() that sits between > fs_initcall() and device_i

Re: [patch] ipv4: initialize arp_tbl rw lock

2006-04-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, so the problem seems to be that inet_init gets called after qeth_init. > Looking at the top level Makefile this seems to be true for all network > drivers in drivers/net/ and drivers/s390/net/ since we have > > vmlinux-main := $(core-y) $(libs-y

Re: [patch] ipv4: initialize arp_tbl rw lock

2006-04-08 Thread David S. Miller
From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 12:02:13 +0200 > Ok, so the problem seems to be that inet_init gets called after qeth_init. > Looking at the top level Makefile this seems to be true for all network > drivers in drivers/net/ and drivers/s390/net/ since we have > > vm

Re: [patch] ipv4: initialize arp_tbl rw lock

2006-04-08 Thread Heiko Carstens
> > The qeth driver makes use of the arp_tbl rw lock. CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK > > detects that this lock is not initialized as it is supposed to be. > > This is a initialization order problem then, because: > arp_init > neigh_table_init > rwlock_init > > does the initial

Re: [PATCH] PCI Error Recovery: e100 network device driver

2006-04-08 Thread Francois Romieu
Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Index: linux-2.6.17-rc1/drivers/net/e100.c > === > --- linux-2.6.17-rc1.orig/drivers/net/e100.c 2006-04-07 16:21:46.0 > -0500 > +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1/drivers/net/e100.c 2006-04-07 18