Fix broken is_beacon().
Signed-off-by: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This wart came with -rc3. The -rc2 was ok. It's not like nobody noticed:
Johannes' snapshot has a different fix (which is somewhat defective,
he declared a CPU-order word as __be16). But the strangest thing is, the
git t
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 23:38 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Ian Kumlien schrieb:
> > I also saw some oddities... portage stopped working, i dunno if this can
> > be MSI related or so, else something is trashing memory in a very
> > special way =P
>
> Yes, 0.15 causes memory corruption even
Dear Collegues,
I have come to consider BUG_ON generally harmful. The idea of an assert is
to prevent a program to execute past a point where its state is known
erroneous, thus preventing it from dealing more damage to the data
(or hiding the traces of malfunction). The problem is, in kernel this
Hi,
Am Freitag 17 Februar 2006 20:39 schrieb Simon Barber:
> In 802.11 networks when connecting to a new AP on the same networks
> (same SSID & security settings) you typically don't have to do DHCP
> again - but with some networks setups you do. In order to detect this,
> when connecting to a ne
On Sunday 26 February 2006 23:31, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:13, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > Ok, I did some reading and just started a git bisect. I didn't find hints
> > on how to bisect if I'm only interested in changes to sky2.[ch], so I'm
> > taking the full kerne
Ian Kumlien schrieb:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 16:47 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 16:00 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:57 +0100, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
>>>
On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>Instead of whin
On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:13, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> Ok, I did some reading and just started a git bisect. I didn't find hints
> on how to bisect if I'm only interested in changes to sky2.[ch], so I'm
> taking the full kernel tree and skip testing those bisect steps that didn't
> change sky
Alan Cox wrote:
Should drop the packet, but it may be triggering a driver path with a
bug. Is this repeatable and with multiple 8139 cards
I took the card out of my firewall and put it into my test box. The
test procedure was to ping a third machine from the text box and then
start pinging t
Francois Romieu wrote:
Can you send lspci -vx, dmesg and lsmod after the hang ?
:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C693A/694x [Apollo
PRO133x] (rev c4)
Subsystem: Asustek Computer, Inc.: Unknown device 80e7
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 17:19 -0500, John Stoffel wrote:
> > "Matthieu" == Matthieu CASTET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matthieu> I will say, why not put the restriction of the firmware
> Matthieu> binary blob ? It run on the device so it will be difficult
> Matthieu> for people to analyse i
El Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:13:08 -0800,
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Why? You can build unix domain sockets as a loadable module and
> it runs fine (or it did last I tried). Whether that makes sense from a
I've been running with CONFIG_UNIX=m since the dawn of time and everythin
On Sunday 26 February 2006 16:00, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:57 +0100, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > Stephen, if you want me (as suggested off-list) to bisect the individual
> > patches leading from 0.13a to current head, please give me a series of
> > patches to incrementally app
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 16:47 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 16:00 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:57 +0100, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > > On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > Instead of whining, try this.
> > >
> > > I tr
Hi,
Well, here it is. I've not been able to run-test it yet, but it at least
compiles and loads without problems. This is on x86_64 compiled against
Linville's wireless-2.6 git tree. (I don't have any x86 boxes running Linux
right now, but it should be alright).
I've added a struct acx_ops wit
In latest -mm de620 gave following warning:
WARNING: drivers/net/de620.o - Section mismatch: reference to \
.init.text:de620_probe from .text between 'init_module' (at offset \
0x1682) and 'cleanup_module'
init_module() call de620_probe() which is declared __init.
Fix is to declare init_modul
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 16:00 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:57 +0100, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > Instead of whining, try this.
> >
> > I tried and still see the hang.
>
> I'm at a record 12 hours with that pat
In latest -mm sbni gives following warning:
WARNING: drivers/net/wan/sbni.o - Section mismatch: reference to\
.init.data: from .text between 'init_module' (at offset 0x14ef) and \
'cleanup_module'
The warning is caused by init_module() calling a function declared
__init.
Declare init_module()
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 18:03 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Instead of whining, try this.
I'm sorry to say that this failed after 12h 33m =P
--
Ian Kumlien -- http://pomac.netswarm.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello,
> Ok, great, I was just wondering since I would have made one if you had
> no plans to do so.
Well, I was just waiting to make sure it was interesting for someone ;)
Here is it, verified with tab and not spaces... but attached as my mailer
is likely to cripple anything I try to inline...
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:57 +0100, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Instead of whining, try this.
>
> I tried and still see the hang.
I'm at a record 12 hours with that patch.
> Stephen, if you want me (as suggested off-list) to bisect the
On 2/26/06, Paul Rolland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > are you planning a 2.6 patch as well ?
> >
> I'm preparing it, and I'll be carefull with Tab/space ;)
>
Ok, great, I was just wondering since I would have made one if you had
no plans to do so.
--
Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Do
Hello,
> are you planning a 2.6 patch as well ?
>
I'm preparing it, and I'll be carefull with Tab/space ;)
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
John Zielinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[8139 failure]
Can you send lspci -vx, dmesg and lsmod after the hang ?
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.h
Hello,
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:07, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On 2/23/06, Anders K. Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have a couple of servers with Mylex RAID controllers (handled by the
> > DAC960 block device driver). There's normally no keyboard or mouse
> > attached, and neither the D
> > > > > > > > Have you tried enabling the NMI watchdog? Enable
> > > CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC and
> > > > > > > > boot with `nmi_watchdog=1' on the command line, make sure that
> > > the NMI line
> > > > > > > > of /proc/interrupts is incrementing.
> > > > > > > I'll give it a try. I've added
On 2/25/06, Paul Rolland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch is based on Linux 2.4.32, and I've verified the same problem
> exists on 2.6.15.4.
are you planning a 2.6 patch as well ?
--
Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.
On Sad, 2006-02-25 at 23:23 -0500, John Zielinski wrote:
> I'm surprised that the switch actually let the jumbo packet through onto
> a 100Mbit link. I'm going to see if I can find a non RTL 8139 card in
> my parts bin and see what that one does.
>
> What's the normal behavior for overruns on a
> it's mangled, tabs have been turned into whitespaces. I fixed
> it so please
> use the appended one.
Sorry about that, thanks for the fix.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger
Hello Paul,
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:08:49AM +0100, Paul Rolland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch is based on Linux 2.4.32, and I've verified the same problem
> exists on 2.6.15.4.
it's mangled, tabs have been turned into whitespaces. I fixed it so please
use the appended one.
> Working on a ma
On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Instead of whining, try this.
I tried and still see the hang.
Stephen, if you want me (as suggested off-list) to bisect the individual
patches leading from 0.13a to current head, please give me a series of
patches to incrementally app
On 2/23/06, Anders K. Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a couple of servers with Mylex RAID controllers (handled by the
> DAC960 block device driver). There's normally no keyboard or mouse
> attached, and neither the DAC960 nor the NIC driver (e100) provides
> entropy to the
31 matches
Mail list logo
