Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff-tree 2f9196a9a825b97b2b9b3471da22682cf2720def (from
ec36f4b4e7671a87861d06b5a86143c9e9152eaa)
Author: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri Sep 9 18:29:50 2005 -0400
Remove conditionals that are useless in the kernel.
We ar
Author: Jean Tourrilhes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use new Wireless Extension API for wireless stats.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.c b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.c
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.c
@@
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff-tree ec36f4b4e7671a87861d06b5a86143c9e9152eaa (from
9cd99739afa14e22f75a4940f53116aa8f8247d8)
Author: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri Sep 9 18:24:50 2005 -0400
Update PCMCIA ID's.
Intel Pro/Wireless 2011 and 2011B hav
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 12:24 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +#ifdef __IN_PCMCIA_PACKAGE__
> > +#include
> > +#endif /* __IN_PCMCIA_PACKAGE__ */
>
> this doesn't make sense for a 2.6 driver.
Fixed in my tree, thanks. Patches will be sent shortly.
> > +#ifdef SPECTRUM_FW_INCLUDED
> > +/* He
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 09 Sep 2005 23:31:32 +0200), Patrick
McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > --- a/include/linux/in6.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/in6.h
>
> > +#define IPV6_RECVHOPLIMIT 64
> > +#define IPV6_HOPLIMIT 65
>
> 64 and 65 are already in use by ip6_tabl
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:22:59AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:57:57PM -0700, David S. Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 18:00:55 +0400
> >
> > > sock_sendfile() and gen
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:53:19 -0700
> Create one iterator for walking over FIB trie, and use it
> for all the /proc functions. Add a /proc/net/route
> output for backwards compatibility with old applications.
>
> Make initialization of fib_trie same as
Rediff of earlier patch... against net-2.6.git
Create one iterator for walking over FIB trie, and use it
for all the /proc functions. Add a /proc/net/route
output for backwards compatibility with old applications.
Make initialization of fib_trie same as fib_hash so no #ifdef
is needed in af_inet.
Trying again to get this to netdev, sorry if duplicate...
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV6]: Support several new sockopt / ancillary data in
Advanced API (RFC3542).
Thanks for getting a lot of this update done.
+/* RFC3542 advanced socket options (50-67) */
+#define IPV6_RECVPKTINFO 50
+#de
On Sep 9, 2005, at 05:10, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Andy Fleming wrote:
Is the cost of an extra read every minute really too high?
You probably didn't look at the code. The MII registers are not
exposed in the PCI space, they need to be accessed through a serial
proto
Hi,
On 09/09/05, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears when I try to download gnome-2.12 from bittorrent. I tried to
> download openoffice from bt and everything was ok.
I have tried to download other big iso file from bt and problem still
appears. It's not gnome-2.12 specifi
Hi,
Herbert Xu napisał(a):
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:31:26PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:02:17 -0700
KERNEL: assertion ((int)tp->lost_out >= 0) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (2148)
So tp->lost_out went negative, didn't we
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:59:29AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Would you be kind enough to resend -again-, rediff'd against latest
> upstream git tree?
Here we go..
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/include/net/ieee80211_crypt.h
==
Marc Lehmann wrote:
> It's also a 64-bit-only problem. To verify, I tried this:
>
> ethtool -K eth1 rx off tx off sg off
>
> Where eth1 is the interface where pppoe runs over.
>
> ethtool -k eth1 then displayed:
>
>rx-checksumming: off
>tx-checksumming: off
>scatter-gather: off
>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:44:06AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Tommy Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > John W. Linville wrote:
> > > Any chance you could re-diff this to apply on top of the patch posted
> > > earlier today by Neil Horman?
> >
> > Sure, but his patch didn't apply to
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Andy Fleming wrote:
The new PHY Layer (drivers/net/phy/*) can provide all these features
for you without much difficulty, I suspect.
As pointed to be Andrew a few days ago, this driver supports a lot of
chips - for most of them the test hardware would be hard to come by
a
Tommy Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John W. Linville wrote:
> > Any chance you could re-diff this to apply on top of the patch posted
> > earlier today by Neil Horman?
>
> Sure, but his patch didn't apply to -git8.
>
> If Neil would please resend, then I can diff against that.
>
Is
John W. Linville wrote:
Any chance you could re-diff this to apply on top of the patch posted
earlier today by Neil Horman?
Sure, but his patch didn't apply to -git8.
If Neil would please resend, then I can diff against that.
-Tommy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
18 matches
Mail list logo
