Re: atheros driver (1/8)

2005-08-04 Thread Matt Mackall
Some initial comments: - you should include a description of each patch in the message - you should use more descriptive subjects, eg [PATCH 1/8] atheros: Kconfig bits -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the

argh... ;/

2005-08-04 Thread Mateusz Berezecki
I accidentaly posted the patches as MIME attachments... its 5:03 am here already. Sorry guys. I can resubmit if you want. I just dont want do that now and not trash your mailboxes Mateusz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROT

atheros driver (8/8)

2005-08-04 Thread Mateusz Berezecki
diff -uprN -X 'netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/Documentation/dontdiff' netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/other.c netdev-atheros/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/other.c --- netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/other.c 1970-01-01 01:00:

atheros driver (7/8)

2005-08-04 Thread Mateusz Berezecki
diff -uprN -X 'netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/Documentation/dontdiff' netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/keys.c netdev-atheros/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/keys.c --- netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/keys.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.

atheros driver (6/8)

2005-08-04 Thread Mateusz Berezecki
diff -uprN -X 'netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/Documentation/dontdiff' netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/ioctl.c netdev-atheros/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/ioctl.c --- netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/ioctl.c 1970-01-01 01:00:

atheros driver (5/8)

2005-08-04 Thread Mateusz Berezecki
diff -uprN -X 'netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/Documentation/dontdiff' netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/init.c netdev-atheros/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/init.c --- netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/init.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.

atheros driver (3/8)

2005-08-04 Thread Mateusz Berezecki
diff -uprN -X 'netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/Documentation/dontdiff' netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/beacons.c netdev-atheros/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/beacons.c --- netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/atheros/atheros5212/beacons.c 1970-01-01

atheros driver (1/8)

2005-08-04 Thread Mateusz Berezecki
--- netdev-2.6.git#ieee80211/drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig 2005-08-02 13:18:21.0 +0200 +++ netdev-atheros/drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig 2005-08-05 03:43:32.0 +0200 @@ -459,6 +459,14 @@ config PRISM54 say M here and read . The module will be called prism54.ko. +comment "At

atheros driver - desc

2005-08-04 Thread Mateusz Berezecki
Hi list members, I just post the code for review for anyone interested. I would be more than pleased to hear some feedback from you on the code. Im sending a series of 8 patches splitted and diffed as in SubmittingPatches documentation. The driver is not yet fully working because I didn't fin

[Question]No memory release after enlarge fib_info hash table

2005-08-04 Thread Yan Zheng
linux 2.6.12.3 net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:line 679 if (fib_info_cnt >= fib_hash_size) { unsigned int new_size = fib_hash_size << 1; struct hlist_head *new_info_hash; struct hlist_head *new_laddrhash; unsigned int bytes;

Re: [TCP]: Fix TSO cwnd caching bug

2005-08-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:58:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Thanks, Guillaume. Herbert, David is travelling and not able to do a lot > > of patchmonkeying. Could you please prepare and submit a final patch? > > OK, here is the final versi

Re: Resend: [RFC/PATCH] "safer ipv4 reassembly"

2005-08-04 Thread Arthur Kepner
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Anyway, here is a patch to use inetpeer instead of that icky ipc > structure.? It sure cuts down the size of the patch :) > Herbert; I've been using the updated patch, and I like it. struct inet_peer is the right place to do this accounting. I m

[TCP]: Fix TSO cwnd caching bug

2005-08-04 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:58:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Thanks, Guillaume. Herbert, David is travelling and not able to do a lot > of patchmonkeying. Could you please prepare and submit a final patch? OK, here is the final version. It depends on the patch that David posted earlier o

Re: 2.6.13-rc4 - kernel panic - BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:918

2005-08-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Guillaume Pelat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 01:33:29PM +1000, herbert wrote: > > > >>So I suppose we should reset cwnd_quota after tcp_transmit_skb? > > > > Please try this patch to see if this is really the problem or not. > > > > Thanks

Re: [PATCH] add new nfnetlink_log subsystem

2005-08-04 Thread Harald Welte
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:49:46AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:03:53 +0200 > > > However, all nfnetlink-based protocols are supposed to be both endian > > and 32/64 as well as alignment (*) safe. the protocol definitions > > a

Re: [PATCH] add new nfnetlink_log subsystem

2005-08-04 Thread Andi Kleen
> Unless I'm overlooking something, to the best of my knowledge I don't > think we could still run into any trouble here. Still risky. Here's a different idea. Define a new aligned u64 type and use that on i386 too. Like /* Must be #define because __attribute__ doesn't work on typedefs */ #defi

Re: [PATCH] add new nfnetlink_log subsystem

2005-08-04 Thread Harald Welte
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:50:42AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] add new nfnetlink_log subsystem > Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:19:41 +0200 > > > > no, it hasn't. I am travelling and don't have the space for a > > > debian/i386 installatio

Re: [RFC] Net vm deadlock fix (preliminary)

2005-08-04 Thread Daniel Phillips
Whoops: - return __dev_alloc_skb(length, gfp_mask | __GFP_MEMALLOC); + return __dev_alloc_skb(length, GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_MEMALLOC); Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [RFC] Net vm deadlock fix (preliminary)

2005-08-04 Thread Daniel Phillips
Hi, I spent the last day mulling things over and doing research. It seems to me that the patch as first posted is correct and solves the deadlock, except that some uses of __GFP_MEMALLOC in __dev_alloc_skb may escape into contexts where the reserve is not guaranteed to be reclaimed. It may be

Re: latest netdev tree - (broadcom44 bug?) letting you know...

2005-08-04 Thread Mateusz Berezecki
Jeff Garzik wrote: Nothing in that tree has changed the b44 driver... Ok, so I will try to find out what has changed as soon as I have some more time also please ignore forwarded e-mail. I just updated the netdev list address. Mateusz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4952] New: IPSec incompabilty. Linux kernel waits to long to start using new SA for outbound traffic.

2005-08-04 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:48:18AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > When you add an SA, you have to place it somewhere, don't you? > And that "where" (be it one policy template, or many) are > what you use to decide which policy for which to do the DST > flush. Unfortunately, it goes straight in

networking problems when using gcc 4.0.1

2005-08-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 08:53:52PM -0400, Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer wrote: > > Moreover I get some weird networking problems which prevent setting up the > routes (RNETLINK invalid argument messages) when I compile my kernel with > 4.0.1 while the same kernel, same config works fine compiled with

Re: tg3: jumbo frames broken on BCM5721 in 2.6.12.2?

2005-08-04 Thread Michael Chan
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 18:27 +0200, Zoran Dzelajlija wrote: > I can't get jumbo frames to work for tg3 under 2.6.12.2 > or 2.6.11.7 (no patches added): > The 5721 does not support jumbo frames, only 1500 MTU frames. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body

RE: Super TSO performance drop

2005-08-04 Thread Leonid Grossman
> -Original Message- > From: David S. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 6:52 AM > To: Leonid Grossman > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Super TSO performance drop > > From: "Leonid Grossman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 21:07:56

tg3: jumbo frames broken on BCM5721 in 2.6.12.2?

2005-08-04 Thread Zoran Dzelajlija
Hi, I can't get jumbo frames to work for tg3 under 2.6.12.2 or 2.6.11.7 (no patches added): filestore# ip link set eth1 mtu 9000 SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument filestore# ifconfig eth1 mtu 9000 SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument I've also tried disabling the vlan devices, or setting them first, but no

[PATCH ieee80211] ieee80211.h: minor changes to header

2005-08-04 Thread Michael Wu
(resend to netdev@vger.kernel.org, previous email went to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Hi, This patch: - fixes misc. whitespace/comments - replaces u16 with __le16/__be16 where appropriate Signed-off-by: Michael Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/include/net/ieee80211.h b/include/net/ieee80211.h --- a/i

Re: 2.6.13-rc4 - kernel panic - BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:918

2005-08-04 Thread Guillaume Pelat
Hi, Herbert Xu wrote: On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 01:33:29PM +1000, herbert wrote: So I suppose we should reset cwnd_quota after tcp_transmit_skb? Please try this patch to see if this is really the problem or not. Thanks, I just applied your patch, and it seems to work :) 2 hours uptime, and

Re: [PATCH] IPSec anti-replay sequence numbers

2005-08-04 Thread Ulrich Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 KOVACS Krisztian wrote: > Ulrich, I already have some code which supports per-state > difference settings, along with optional time limits. I don't know > whether or not the latter would be necessary or not, but putting > the per-state diff values wou

Re: [PATCH] IPSec anti-replay sequence numbers

2005-08-04 Thread KOVACS Krisztian
Hi, 2005-08-04, cs keltezéssel 12.56-kor Ulrich Weber ezt írta: > thanks for revising Patrick! Attached is the updated patch. > Sorry had no time yet to remove the sysctl variables. > It will follow in a few weeks if I have more time :) Ulrich, I already have some code which supports per-sta

Re: [PATCH] add new nfnetlink_log subsystem

2005-08-04 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:49:46AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:03:53 +0200 > > > However, all nfnetlink-based protocols are supposed to be both endian > > and 32/64 as well as alignment (*) safe. the protocol definitions > > a

Re: Super TSO performance drop

2005-08-04 Thread David S. Miller
From: "Leonid Grossman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 21:07:56 -0400 > We can either provide a remote to the setup, or test incremental patches > if #16 can be broken in smaller pieces. I think it would be more productive for you to work on trying to figure out what about the packet p

Re: 8139cp misses interrupts during resume

2005-08-04 Thread Pierre Ossman
Pierre Ossman wrote: > I'm having problem with the interrupt getting killed after suspend with > my 8139cp controller. The problem only appears if the cable is connected > during resume (before suspend is irrelevant) and the interface is down. > > Both suspend-to-disk and suspend-to-ram exhibit th

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4952] New: IPSec incompabilty. Linux kernel waits to long to start using new SA for outbound traffic.

2005-08-04 Thread David S. Miller
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:32:15 +1000 > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 06:34:38AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > Therefore, when any SA is added, the assosciated policy is the > > one for which we flush all matching DST entries. > > How do you find the associated p

Re: [PATCH] add new nfnetlink_log subsystem

2005-08-04 Thread David S. Miller
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] add new nfnetlink_log subsystem Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:19:41 +0200 > > no, it hasn't. I am travelling and don't have the space for a > > debian/i386 installation in addition to the debian/x86_64 on this box, > > sorry :( > > That sounds

Re: [PATCH] add new nfnetlink_log subsystem

2005-08-04 Thread David S. Miller
From: Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:03:53 +0200 > However, all nfnetlink-based protocols are supposed to be both endian > and 32/64 as well as alignment (*) safe. the protocol definitions > always use u_intXX_t types, all network byte order, and no kernel pointers > p

Re: [PATCH] 8139cp - redetect link after suspend

2005-08-04 Thread Pierre Ossman
John W. Linville wrote: >On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 12:22:53AM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > >>After suspend the driver needs to retest link status in case the cable >>has been inserted or removed during the suspend. >> >>Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > >Please copy n

Re: [PATCH] IPSec anti-replay sequence numbers

2005-08-04 Thread Ulrich Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, thanks for revising Patrick! Attached is the updated patch. Sorry had no time yet to remove the sysctl variables. It will follow in a few weeks if I have more time :) Best regards Ulrich -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (

Re: 2.6.13-rc4 - kernel panic - BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:918

2005-08-04 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 01:33:29PM +1000, herbert wrote: > > So I suppose we should reset cwnd_quota after tcp_transmit_skb? Please try this patch to see if this is really the problem or not. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[patch 5/5] fib_trie: use RCU (EXPERIMENTAL)

2005-08-04 Thread Robert Olsson
Stephen Hemminger writes: > Convert FIB Trie to use RCU for the normal lookup fast > path. Use simple spin_lock for updates and dump access. Hello! Yes spent some days to get a complete RCU for the trie. Discussed with Patrick at OLS. This includes your start and also RCU versions of fib

RE: ARP entry ageing time

2005-08-04 Thread Partha Chatterjee
Hello, Could someone please help me out on this. I am desperately looking out for a solution. Thanks, Partha x3025 -Original Message- From: Partha Chatterjee Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:50 PM To: Partha Chatterjee; netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: ARP entry ageing time Hello,