Error return -5018 when connecting to server.

2000-04-29 Thread Tom Watson
which look acceptable to me, except for the error. I've tried an AppleVolumes file in the user home directory, and that does change the volume name, but the same error pops up. Is this because I'm using AFS 1.1 on my client?? Thanks for any help. -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: Error return -5018 when connecting to server.

2000-04-29 Thread Tom Watson
On Sat, 29 Apr 2000 07:18:54 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 0:37 Uhr -0800 29.04.2000, Tom Watson wrote: > > >I've just put a netatalk system on a local Linux box and on the face > >of it, it looks OK. There is a "small" problem. When attempting t

Re: Error return -5018 when connecting to server.

2000-05-02 Thread Tom Watson
On Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:03:43 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tom Watson wrote: > > I've just put a netatalk system on a local Linux box and on the face > > of it, it looks OK. There is a "small" problem. When attempting to > > connect to the server

PCL over PAP (was Re: Unfamiliar with netatalk printing...)

2000-05-04 Thread Tom Watson
hen GhostScript to PCL, sending it out. Proper configuration files necessary to do this would be a nice "cookbook" solution. > > -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Error -5018 revisited, AFP 1.1 vs. AFP 2.1

2000-05-07 Thread Tom Watson
xecuted when this client runs. Client #1 identifies as AFS 1.1, client #2 identifies as AFS 2.1. My next step is to modify 'afpd' to check the error return from the 'quotactl' system call to see if that really is the problem. Film/Video at 11. Does this lend some insight into the 'problem' (if any). -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: ethernet card

2000-05-07 Thread Tom Watson
the kernel, you must specify that multicast is provided for. It turns out that some drivers confuse hardware multicast (level 2, datalink) with protocol multicast (level 3, netowrk). They both have the same name, but are quite different in their application. Hope this helps. -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: Error -5018 revisited, AFP 1.1 vs. AFP 2.1

2000-05-07 Thread Tom Watson
On Sun, 7 May 2000 07:18:36 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 22:08 Uhr -0800 06.05.2000, Tom Watson wrote: > > >Does this lend some insight into the 'problem' (if any). > > Uhm, you may try to set -DNEED_QUOTACTL_WRAPPER in sys/linux/Makefile > an

Re: Benchmarks..

2000-05-07 Thread Tom Watson
the other direction might yield different results. Then again, I could have heard incorrectly. -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: papd and APS Filter -- good news

2000-05-09 Thread Tom Watson
t be in order. I don't know the actual responses that an AppleTalk connected Epson printer might give, as I don't have such a device (the nearest one that I could play with is about 700 miles away). Besides I don't have a sniffer handy. The next time I get there I might do some playing around. Hope this helps. -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: On Mac: How is file type and creator determined?

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Watson
pe/creator information IS contained in the ".AppleDouble" directory with the resource fork information. The specification for "AppleDouble" contains the file format. There are utilities for a Mac that quite easily modify the type/creator information. My preference is "snitch&qu

Re: Appletalk routing.... please help!!!

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Watson
st likely work. The simplest being an ImageWriter cable. It works like a 10Base-T crossover cable. Hope this information is of use. -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: Good printer for a netatalk setup

2000-05-11 Thread Tom Watson
that plugs into them. Epson is one of those. Note that the pinter doesn't register (obviously) as a LaserPrinter, but something else (Epson's case it is 'EpsonLQ2'). I'm looking at how to do this correctly, and it might take a tweeking of 'papd', or at bit of work

Printcap problem...

2000-05-25 Thread Tom Watson
I thought it would be simple. Just setup a pap server and have it spool out to the LPR queue. It isn't that easy... >From the file '/var/log/lpr.log' (written by papd): (all with machine ID and papd process id number) ...: restart (1.4b2+asun2.0a18.2) ...: No such printer: lp ...: printcap prob

Re: Printcap problem...

2000-05-25 Thread Tom Watson
On Thu, 25 May 2000 07:31:32 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 25 May 2000, Tom Watson wrote: > > > I thought it would be simple. Just setup a pap server and have it spool > > out to the LPR queue. It isn't that easy... > > > > >From the fi

RE: Printcap problem... EPSON almost there

2000-05-25 Thread Tom Watson
are parsed. I've got similar problems with an Epson Color Stylus printer. The spool is a little 'wierd'. I'm still investigating. But I see that you didn't need to specify a pipe as part of the printer. I haven't gotten THAT part to function yet. -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: Help! Deskjet w/o ghostscript?

2000-05-29 Thread Tom Watson
ndors would publish the responses, it might encourage us peons to write nice software for them (last I heard, brimstone had a high melting point *SIGH*). I suspect that we should be thankful that there are PostScript "Document Conventions". -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: netatalk in production environments....(RFC)

2000-05-31 Thread Tom Watson
Then I could have the Linux box "route" and (later) supply IP addresses as well (regards to John V.). p.s. I'm looking at papd!! -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: netatalk in production environments....(RFC)

2000-06-01 Thread Tom Watson
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:38:03 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 19:07 Uhr -0800 31.05.2000, Tom Watson wrote: > > >One area I would be interested in is kernel support for LocalTalk I/O > >boards. > > Is already there in 2.2. But see also my message about NBP/r

New release/new version

2000-06-04 Thread Tom Watson
platforms, and get it out. Then "we" can attack the flaws/bugs in a reasonable time frame. If there is a "release" that "works" (and has for a reasonable length of time), call it. Getting into the "patch" idea of something like CAP (i thought it was bad at

Re: binary writes fail with latest version

2000-06-14 Thread Tom Watson
and as such are compatable with windows programs that don't have the resrouce/data fork distinction. There are exceptions, such as MPW text files that have things like font information in the resource fork, but these are few. To say "executables usually don't have a data fork"

Re: Cooler Icons?

2000-06-23 Thread Tom Watson
> If you want to achieve excellence, you can get there today. As of this > second, quit doing less-than-excellent work. > -Thomas Watson, founder of IBM Sorry, no relation... -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: AppleShare Protocol - Good Book?

2000-06-28 Thread Tom Watson
n as a contractor!! p.s. If you decide to hack away, get something that can look at the packets on the wire. Usually they have decoding modules that can show how clients/servers SHOULD interpret the packets. -- Tom Watson Generic short signature [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm at home now)

Re: atalkd.conf get rewritten by netatalk 1.4b2+asun2.1.4-39_test

2000-06-28 Thread Tom Watson
n NT box (yuck) always wanted to seed network 100 as "Default Zone", and we couldn't get rid of it. It persisted in the routine tables of other boxes, which kept propogating the (bad) zone information. Advice: Once you have the routes setup, change the configuration file to s

Re: Netatalk on FreeBSD 3.4

2000-07-05 Thread Tom Watson
denek > Your best bet is to check to see that your ethernet driver supports recieve filtering of multicast addresses (or has a hack around). In addition, check to see that your kernel was configured to allow multicast. While the variable in Linux is for IP-multicast, (not hardware multicast)