Re: ADSP

2000-01-14 Thread Rob Newberry
All of the documentation on the protocols is in Inside AppleTalk, freely available on Apple's web site in PDF form. http://developer.apple.com/macos/opentransport/docs/dev/Inside_AppleTalk.pdf > Well, I wanted AppleScript over ADSP native so that I didn't have to > open the IP security hole

Freezing MACs

2000-01-14 Thread Dirk Freese (DeWo)
Hi everyone, we recently set-up netatalk under SuSE Linux 5.3 in a network with an Apple G3 and a PowerMac and four PCs. The server runs afpd and smbd. We created three shares accessable from the PCs and the MACs - As long as the PCs use the shares, there are no problems. But when the MACs acces

Re: Security problem

2000-01-14 Thread Philip Bertuglia
For afpd to do the "permission forcing" that smbd does, it needs to run as root. I don't think that was ever the intention for afpd and it would need to be totally rewritten. If anyone disagrees please chime it. I am looking forward to your new release A. Sun, and thank you for your hard work on

Re: Printer Accounting with papd

2000-01-14 Thread Jon Knight
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, S.Barbaresi wrote: > we would like to integrate our Mac's with the printer accounting system by > using "papd". We've installed and configured atalkd, afpd and papd on our > Solaris boxes, but all print jobs are created by the same user, > consequently, the printer accounting

Printer Accounting with papd

2000-01-14 Thread S.Barbaresi
Hello, we would like to integrate our Mac's with the printer accounting system by using "papd". We've installed and configured atalkd, afpd and papd on our Solaris boxes, but all print jobs are created by the same user, consequently, the printer accounting system cant distinguish each job. The Q

intial netatalk install on Redhat

2000-01-14 Thread Russ Button
I've got an Apple Laserwriter IIg printer, with an ethertalk interface, and a Redhat Linux 6.1 box on my network. I want the Linux box to be able to print to the Apple printer and to act as a print spooler for other machines on the network. I'm given to understand that netatalk is the tool to

Re: Security problem

2000-01-14 Thread Patrick Zwahlen
a sun wrote: > > currently, afpd doesn't handle group situations that well. in the next > development series, i plan to redo the permissions stuff to handle AFP > permission semantics. some of that will entail being clever with > seteuid(). In fact, the way SAMBA handles this problem is quite cl