Re: Memory leak in inetCidrRouteTable 5.7.3

2016-11-09 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 16:10:33 +0530 Soubhagya wrote: SP> Yes, we have used mib2c compiler to generate the code and which SP> I feel it's same to MFD template. SP> SP> Apart from "Which method would you like to use to gather data SP> about available rows?" option all other option we choosed is SP> DE

Re: Memory leak in inetCidrRouteTable 5.7.3

2016-11-09 Thread Soubhagya Panigrahi
Hi Robert, Thank you for your response. We have already implemented this table using autogeneration method. But while doing a continuous query, I got memory leak in inetCidrRouteTable and that's the reason I am going through all over again, specially *_container_load() and add_ipv6_route_entries(

Re: Memory leak in inetCidrRouteTable 5.7.3

2016-11-07 Thread Robert Story
[Replying only to coders list] On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:25:49 +0530 Soubhagya wrote: SP> I have some queries with respect to memory leak in inetCidrRouteTable while SP> continuous query to inetCidrRouteTable . SP> [...] SP> As part of my project, we have added a support for ipv6 route entry in SP> "a

Memory leak in inetCidrRouteTable 5.7.3

2016-11-07 Thread Soubhagya Panigrahi
Hi All, I have some queries with respect to memory leak in inetCidrRouteTable while continuous query to inetCidrRouteTable . Valgrind report === 7480 ==16547== 7,569,856 bytes in 3,416 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5,344 of 5,344 7481 ==16547==at 0x4C266B0: calloc (in