Re: Broken builds

2017-05-08 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 10:21:03PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 05/06/17 20:48, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 05:31:06PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > >> On 05/04/17 14:52, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > >>> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:40:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: >

Re: Broken builds

2017-05-08 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 05/06/17 20:48, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 05:31:06PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On 05/04/17 14:52, Magnus Fromreide wrote: >>> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:40:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 05/04/17 00:25, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > I looks like the cha

Re: Broken builds

2017-05-06 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 05:31:06PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 05/04/17 14:52, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:40:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > On 05/04/17 00:25, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > > > I looks like the change 9641b472ef01208f92631016e91b0a4a518163f

Re: Broken builds

2017-05-05 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 05/04/17 14:52, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:40:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On 05/04/17 00:25, Magnus Fromreide wrote: >>> I looks like the change 9641b472ef01208f92631016e91b0a4a518163f0 (openssl >>> 1.1.0: Fix several build errors) broke the build on machines

Re: Broken builds

2017-05-04 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:40:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 05/04/17 00:25, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > I looks like the change 9641b472ef01208f92631016e91b0a4a518163f0 (openssl > > 1.1.0: Fix several build errors) broke the build on machines where openssl > > is missing, I suppose this w

Re: Broken builds

2017-05-04 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 05/04/17 00:25, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > I looks like the change 9641b472ef01208f92631016e91b0a4a518163f0 (openssl > 1.1.0: Fix several build errors) broke the build on machines where openssl > is missing, I suppose this wasn't intentional? Hello Magnus, Indeed ... the goal was to fix build e

Broken builds

2017-05-04 Thread Magnus Fromreide
Hi! I looks like the change 9641b472ef01208f92631016e91b0a4a518163f0 (openssl 1.1.0: Fix several build errors) broke the build on machines where openssl is missing, I suppose this wasn't intentional? /MF -- Check out the