On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:29:11 GMT, beppo-sturmtief wrote:
> Hi, original filer here. I don't know how you handle such things here, but 24
> files changed seems somewhat excessive to me for this bug.
Yes - I had the same impression at first but AFAICT most of the [superfluous]
changes are due to
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 08:05:54 GMT, Volkan Yazici wrote:
>> persisting with method nomenclature (or painting the bikeshed again). What’s
>> in a name?
>>
>> reset is really init() or setMask()
>>
>> Currently you have a static applyMask() method and a non static
>> applyMask() — is that
> This PR updates the CertificateBuilder with a new method that creates a new
> instance with common fields (subject name, public key, serial number,
> validity, and key uses) filled-in. One test, IPIdentities.java, is updated to
> show how the method can be used to create various certificates.
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 07:52:43 GMT, Volkan Yazici wrote:
>> Fixes endian handling `jdk.internal.net.http.websocket.Frame.Masker`.
>>
>> ### Implementation notes
>>
>> I deleted the `Frame` clone in tests, and rewired the test code depending on
>> it to the actual `Frame`. To enable this, I relax
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:47:59 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote:
> The similarity between the certificate pairs is impressive! Just curious -
> why the change in issuer and owner names?
After looking into this some more, I found that `X500Name(String dname)` is
expecting the string to be in the same o
