> switching to nanoTime as suggested in ticket comments
serhiysachkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8281511: updating TcpTest to use new checkIfTimeOut method instead of
checkTime one
-
Changes:
- all: https://gi
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 01:34:07 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Two java/net/InetAddress tests fails "java.net.UnknownHostException" on some
>> special machines. The machine cannot connect to the Internet directly and
>> needs to be connected to the Internet through a jump machine. The
>>
Hi all,
no idea if I am in the right place here, but I have no account to create a
tracker issue and also could not find out how to get one...
I was just using the java.net.html.WebSocket (jdk17 specifically, but the issue
should still be there at least in 21 from a quick look into the code) fo
Hi Simon,
Thank you for the report.
I am not too familiar with WebSocket. But since this is
a networking protocol I would expect binary data to be
transferred on the wire in network byte order.
So the expectation from WebSocket::sendBinary that the
byte buffer is in network byte order (big endi
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:25:58 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/net/ipv6tests/Tests.java line 161:
>>
>>> 159: if (got < expected) {
>>> 160: throw new RuntimeException("checkIfTimeOut failed: got " +
>>> got
>>> 161: + ", expected at least " + expe
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 10:56:14 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Generally looks good - but are these tests more stable now on all supported
> os/arch?
I've run multiple repititions of tests on supported platforms no failure
noticed.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23840#iss
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 10:42:29 GMT, serhiysachkov wrote:
>> switching to nanoTime as suggested in ticket comments
>
> serhiysachkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> 8281511: updating TcpTest to use new checkIfTimeOut method inst
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:38:19 GMT, serhiysachkov wrote:
> switching to nanoTime as suggested in ticket comments
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: ea9e3cfe
Author:Serhiy Sachkov
Committer: Mark Sheppard
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/ea9e3cfe03b5284ef0edc
Hi,
The vote for Jaikiran Pai (jpai) [1] is now closed.
Yes: 4
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
best regards,
-- daniel
[1] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/net-dev/2025-February/025637.html
Hi,
The vote for Daniel Jeliński (djelinski) [1] is now closed.
Yes: 4
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.
best regards,
-- daniel
[1] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/net-dev/2025-February/025638.h
Congrats Jaikiran
> On Mar 5, 2025, at 9:18 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The vote for Jaikiran Pai (jpai) [1] is now closed.
>
> Yes: 4
> Veto: 0
> Abstain: 0
>
> According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
> sufficient to approve the nomination.
>
> best
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 10:42:29 GMT, serhiysachkov wrote:
>> switching to nanoTime as suggested in ticket comments
>
> serhiysachkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> 8281511: updating TcpTest to use new checkIfTimeOut method inst
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 10:42:29 GMT, serhiysachkov wrote:
>> switching to nanoTime as suggested in ticket comments
>
> serhiysachkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> 8281511: updating TcpTest to use new checkIfTimeOut method inst
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:47:25 GMT, Xiaolong Peng wrote:
>> java.net.URI.scanIPv4Address is a private method, it is only called by
>> java.net.URI.takeIPv4Address and java.net.URI.parseIPv4Address, the
>> URISyntaxException("Malformed IPv4 address") is not necessary, returning -1
>> should be go
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:47:25 GMT, Xiaolong Peng wrote:
>> java.net.URI.scanIPv4Address is a private method, it is only called by
>> java.net.URI.takeIPv4Address and java.net.URI.parseIPv4Address, the
>> URISyntaxException("Malformed IPv4 address") is not necessary, returning -1
>> should be go
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 15:06:37 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi, sorry for the late reply. I have imported your PR branch on my local repo
> and am testing it in our CI. I will approve if my tests come back green.
No worries, thank you so much for helping running the test.
-
PR Comment:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:47:25 GMT, Xiaolong Peng wrote:
>> java.net.URI.scanIPv4Address is a private method, it is only called by
>> java.net.URI.takeIPv4Address and java.net.URI.parseIPv4Address, the
>> URISyntaxException("Malformed IPv4 address") is not necessary, returning -1
>> should be go
17 matches
Mail list logo
