Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Sean Mullan
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 06:32:59 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/Executors.java line 529: >> >>> 527: * execute the given {@code callable} under the current access >>> 528: * control context, with the current context class loader as the >>> 529:

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v4]

2024-10-29 Thread Sean Mullan
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:02:44 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 175 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Specify that params

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Sean Mullan
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:00:35 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 186 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Update copyrights.

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Sean Mullan
> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security > Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The > [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the > main changes in the JEP and also includes an apidiff of the specif

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v2]

2024-10-29 Thread Sean Mullan
On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 00:15:24 GMT, Brent Christian wrote: >> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Change apiNote t

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Sean Mullan
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 20:07:57 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 186 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Update copyrights.

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v4]

2024-10-29 Thread Weijun Wang
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:02:00 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 175 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Specify that params

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Brent Christian
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:40:59 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security >> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The >> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the >> main ch

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Roger Riggs
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:40:59 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security >> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The >> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the >> main ch

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Daniel Fuchs
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:40:59 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security >> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The >> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the >> main ch

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v4]

2024-10-29 Thread Roger Riggs
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:29:07 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security >> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The >> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the >> main ch

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v3]

2024-10-29 Thread Harshitha Onkar
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:03:23 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: >> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Merge >> - Updat

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Harshitha Onkar
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:12:55 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: >> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 186 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Update copyrights

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Daniel Fuchs
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:40:59 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security >> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The >> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the >> main ch

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Daniel Fuchs
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:40:59 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security >> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The >> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the >> main ch

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v3]

2024-10-29 Thread Sean Mullan
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 19:55:33 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Merge >> - Update

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v5]

2024-10-29 Thread Daniel Fuchs
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:40:59 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security >> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The >> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the >> main ch

Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs

2024-10-29 Thread David Holmes
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 04:40:50 GMT, Julian Waters wrote: > After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in > the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the > effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the > unuse

Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs

2024-10-29 Thread Julian Waters
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 05:51:30 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in >> the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the >> effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the >> un

Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs

2024-10-29 Thread Julian Waters
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 04:40:50 GMT, Julian Waters wrote: > After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in > the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the > effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the > unuse