Re: [jdk23] RFR: 8325280: Update troff manpages in JDK 23 before RC

2024-07-19 Thread David Holmes
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 05:47:15 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > Before RC we need to update the man pages in the repo from their Markdown > sources. All pages at a minimum have 23-ea replaced with 23, and publication > year set to 2024 if needed. > > This also picks up the unpublished changes to java.

Re: [jdk23] RFR: 8325280: Update troff manpages in JDK 23 before RC

2024-07-19 Thread Alan Bateman
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 05:47:15 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > Before RC we need to update the man pages in the repo from their Markdown > sources. All pages at a minimum have 23-ea replaced with 23, and publication > year set to 2024 if needed. > > This also picks up the unpublished changes to java.

RFR: 8329398: Links in InetAddress class description show "#format"

2024-07-19 Thread Aleksei Efimov
This PR modifies links in the `InetAddress` class-level javadoc showed as `"#format"`. In addition, it changes one grammatical error in the adjacent paragraph. - Commit messages: - 8329398: Links in InetAddress class description show "#format" Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/p

RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation

2024-07-19 Thread Nizar Benalla
Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc comments? The new docs are hosted [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). It's mostly fixing some relative links. If using `{@docroot}` isn't ideal I can change it. Here is the res

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation

2024-07-19 Thread Daniel Jeliński
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 11:11:38 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote: > Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc > comments? The new docs are hosted > [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). > > It's mostly fixing some relative links.

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation

2024-07-19 Thread Daniel Jeliński
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 11:11:38 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote: > Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc > comments? The new docs are hosted > [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). > > It's mostly fixing some relative links.

Re: RFR: 8329398: Links in InetAddress class description show "#format"

2024-07-19 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 11:49:54 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote: > This PR modifies links in the `InetAddress` class-level javadoc showed as > `"#format"`. > In addition, it changes one grammatical error in the adjacent paragraph. Looks good to me. - Marked as reviewed by jpai (Reviewer).

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation [v2]

2024-07-19 Thread Nizar Benalla
> Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc > comments? The new docs are hosted > [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). > > It's mostly fixing some relative links. > If using `{@docroot}` isn't ideal I can change it. > >

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation [v2]

2024-07-19 Thread Nizar Benalla
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 12:44:47 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote: >> Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> remove docroot based on review > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/StructuredTaskScope.java > lin

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation [v2]

2024-07-19 Thread Chen Liang
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:08:06 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote: >> Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc >> comments? The new docs are hosted >> [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). >> >> It's mostly fixing some relative li

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation [v2]

2024-07-19 Thread Nizar Benalla
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:08:06 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote: >> Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc >> comments? The new docs are hosted >> [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). >> >> It's mostly fixing some relative li

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation [v3]

2024-07-19 Thread Nizar Benalla
> Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc > comments? The new docs are hosted > [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). > > It's mostly fixing some relative links. > If using `{@docroot}` isn't ideal I can change it. > >

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation [v3]

2024-07-19 Thread Chen Liang
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 14:05:07 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote: >> Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc >> comments? The new docs are hosted >> [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). >> >> It's mostly fixing some relative li

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation [v4]

2024-07-19 Thread Nizar Benalla
> Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc > comments? The new docs are hosted > [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). > > It's mostly fixing some relative links. > If using `{@docroot}` isn't ideal I can change it. > >

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation [v4]

2024-07-19 Thread Chen Liang
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 14:20:48 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote: >> Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc >> comments? The new docs are hosted >> [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). >> >> It's mostly fixing some relative li

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation [v4]

2024-07-19 Thread Daniel Jeliński
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 14:20:48 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote: >> Can I get a review for this change that fixes some broken links in javadoc >> comments? The new docs are hosted >> [here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/GeneratedDocs/8336039-warnings-links/). >> >> It's mostly fixing some relative li

Re: RFR: 8336039: Doccheck: HTML warnings, broken links and missing files in java.base documentation [v2]

2024-07-19 Thread Daniel Jeliński
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:11:05 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> remove docroot based on review > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/Arena.java line 64: > >> 62: * such,

Re: [jdk23] RFR: 8325280: Update troff manpages in JDK 23 before RC

2024-07-19 Thread Iris Clark
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 05:47:15 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > Before RC we need to update the man pages in the repo from their Markdown > sources. All pages at a minimum have 23-ea replaced with 23, and publication > year set to 2024 if needed. > > This also picks up the unpublished changes to java.