On Mon, 20 May 2024 18:47:35 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> Have you looked into / thought about how this will work for jpackaged apps ?
> I suspect that both the existing FFM usage and this will be options the
> application packager will need to supply when building the jpackaged app -
> the end use
On Tue, 21 May 2024 07:20:05 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > Have you looked into / thought about how this will work for jpackaged apps
> > ? I suspect that both the existing FFM usage and this will be options the
> > application packager will need to supply when building the jpackaged app -
> >
On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:38:25 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR implements [JEP 472](https://openjdk.org/jeps/472), by restricting
>> the use of JNI in the following ways:
>>
>> * `System::load` and `System::loadLibrary` are now restricted methods
>> * `Runtime::load` and `Runtime::loa
On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:38:25 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR implements [JEP 472](https://openjdk.org/jeps/472), by restricting
>> the use of JNI in the following ways:
>>
>> * `System::load` and `System::loadLibrary` are now restricted methods
>> * `Runtime::load` and `Runtime::loa
On Tue, 21 May 2024 08:44:47 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> These are all good suggestions. I have not looked into jpackage, but yes, I
> would expect that the jpackage user would need to provide extra options when
> packaging the application.
It would be good to document how jpackage user
For this PR, I identified TLS tests that can fail due to hard-code certificates
expiring. I updated those tests to use certificates that are generated
programmatically. This includes adding some helper methods to the
CertificateBuilder class to create builder objects with common default values.
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:20:11 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote:
> For this PR, I identified TLS tests that can fail due to hard-code
> certificates expiring. I updated those tests to use certificates that are
> generated programmatically. This includes adding some helper methods to the
> CertificateB
On Fri, 17 May 2024 11:33:14 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this doc-only change which clarifies the value
>> type for the `java.net.SocketOptions.SO_LINGER` option?
>
> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last
On Wed, 15 May 2024 05:06:02 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this doc-only change which clarifies the value
> type for the `java.net.SocketOptions.SO_LINGER` option?
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 5f804b2e
Author:Jaikiran Pai
URL:
http
