On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:20:05 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Here [JDK-8333864](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333864) it has been
> discussed that the test TcpNoDelayNotRequired.java is not giving us much
> benefit these days so it could be removed.
> From 8333864
> "I suppose we could re
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:20:05 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Here [JDK-8333864](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333864) it has been
> discussed that the test TcpNoDelayNotRequired.java is not giving us much
> benefit these days so it could be removed.
> From 8333864
> "I suppose we could re
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:20:05 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Here [JDK-8333864](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333864) it has been
> discussed that the test TcpNoDelayNotRequired.java is not giving us much
> benefit these days so it could be removed.
> From 8333864
> "I suppose we could re
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:20:05 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Here [JDK-8333864](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333864) it has been
> discussed that the test TcpNoDelayNotRequired.java is not giving us much
> benefit these days so it could be removed.
> From 8333864
> "I suppose we could re