Re: Http2, HttpClient, and RFC 9113

2025-01-20 Thread Robert Engels
Sorry for the curtness. Thank you for replying. On mobile. > On Jan 20, 2025, at 12:41 PM, Robert Engels wrote: > > HTTPS incurs considerable overhead. The reason for prior knowledge http2 > connections is to be able to get the multiplexing features of http2 without > paying the https perfor

Re: Http2, HttpClient, and RFC 9113

2025-01-20 Thread Robert Engels
HTTPS incurs considerable overhead. The reason for prior knowledge http2 connections is to be able to get the multiplexing features of http2 without paying the https performance penalties. This is ideal for internal api/application servers that are not exposed to the outside. I guess I don’t u

Re: Http2, HttpClient, and RFC 9113

2025-01-20 Thread Daniel Fuchs
Hi Robert, Sorry for the delay. Prior knowledge has been on my mind for some time. I am however unsure about whether there is an actual use case for the HttpClient to support this. With the deprecation of the HTTP/2 upgrade mechanism, there might be. But are there actual deployment of clear HTT

Re: Http2, HttpClient, and RFC 9113

2025-01-15 Thread robert engels
Hi all, I don’t have the ability to create an OpenJDK issue. Is this not the correct way to get this going? In the past, the net-dev has been responsive to this sort of thing. Maybe this was lost because it was sent over the weekend? Thanks, Robert > On Jan 11, 2025, at 2:10 PM, robert engels