Re: Bug in B6361557

2025-01-11 Thread robert engels
ere a message-body is >>> allowed, its field value MUST exactly match the number of OCTETs in >>> the message-body. HTTP/1.1 user agents MUST notify the user when an >>> invalid length is received and detected." >>> >>> The latter part of this statement refers to a user agent's p

Re: Bug in B6361557

2025-01-06 Thread Robert Engels
>> The latter part of this statement refers to a user agent's processing of a >> response >> >> From: net-dev on behalf of Robert Engels >> >> Sent: 06 January 2025 12:10 >> To: Jaikiran Pai >> Cc: net-d

Re: Bug in B6361557

2025-01-06 Thread Robert Engels
. HTTP/1.1 user agents MUST notify the user when an > invalid length is received and detected." > > The latter part of this statement refers to a user agent's processing of a > response > > From: net-dev on behalf of Robert Eng

Re: Bug in B6361557

2025-01-06 Thread Mark Sheppard
ceived and detected." The latter part of this statement refers to a user agent's processing of a response From: net-dev on behalf of Robert Engels Sent: 06 January 2025 12:10 To: Jaikiran Pai Cc: net-dev@openjdk.org Subject: Re: Bug in B6361557

Re: Bug in B6361557

2025-01-06 Thread Robert Engels
Hi, I saw that too. But if you take that stance, if you change the test to send more than one request per connection it will now fail. I think the refreshed rfcs are impossible to implement and it’s an oversight. > On Jan 6, 2025, at 12:25 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > > I've now raised a PR to

Re: Bug in B6361557

2025-01-05 Thread Jaikiran Pai
I've now raised a PR to address the test issue. As for the following part: On 03/01/25 9:11 pm, robert engels wrote: ... sends an invalid http request according to the specification here https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2616#section-4.4 specifically "When a Content-Length is given in

Re: Bug in B6361557

2025-01-03 Thread Robert Engels
Thanks! > On Jan 3, 2025, at 6:52 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > > Hello Robert, > > This does indeed look like an issue in the test. I've filed > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347000 to address this. Thank you for > bringing it up here. > > -Jaikiran > >> On 03/01/25 9:11 pm, robert eng

Re: Bug in B6361557

2025-01-03 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Hello Robert, This does indeed look like an issue in the test. I've filed https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347000 to address this. Thank you for bringing it up here. -Jaikiran On 03/01/25 9:11 pm, robert engels wrote: Hi, The jdk test B6361557 here https://github.com/openjdk/jdk23u/bl