ere a message-body is
>>> allowed, its field value MUST exactly match the number of OCTETs in
>>> the message-body. HTTP/1.1 user agents MUST notify the user when an
>>> invalid length is received and detected."
>>>
>>> The latter part of this statement refers to a user agent's p
>> The latter part of this statement refers to a user agent's processing of a
>> response
>>
>> From: net-dev on behalf of Robert Engels
>>
>> Sent: 06 January 2025 12:10
>> To: Jaikiran Pai
>> Cc: net-d
. HTTP/1.1 user agents MUST notify the user when an
> invalid length is received and detected."
>
> The latter part of this statement refers to a user agent's processing of a
> response
>
> From: net-dev on behalf of Robert Eng
ceived and detected."
The latter part of this statement refers to a user agent's processing of a
response
From: net-dev on behalf of Robert Engels
Sent: 06 January 2025 12:10
To: Jaikiran Pai
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.org
Subject: Re: Bug in B6361557
Hi,
I saw that too. But if you take that stance, if you change the test to send
more than one request per connection it will now fail. I think the refreshed
rfcs are impossible to implement and it’s an oversight.
> On Jan 6, 2025, at 12:25 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
> I've now raised a PR to
I've now raised a PR to address the test issue. As for the following part:
On 03/01/25 9:11 pm, robert engels wrote:
...
sends an invalid http request according to the specification here
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2616#section-4.4
specifically "When a Content-Length is given in
Thanks!
> On Jan 3, 2025, at 6:52 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
> Hello Robert,
>
> This does indeed look like an issue in the test. I've filed
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347000 to address this. Thank you for
> bringing it up here.
>
> -Jaikiran
>
>> On 03/01/25 9:11 pm, robert eng
Hello Robert,
This does indeed look like an issue in the test. I've filed
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347000 to address this. Thank you
for bringing it up here.
-Jaikiran
On 03/01/25 9:11 pm, robert engels wrote:
Hi,
The jdk test B6361557 here
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk23u/bl