On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 15:11:26 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote:
> The AIX change looks harmless and test/jdk/java/net/Socket tests have passed
> on AIX. Let me know if you would like to have more tests.
Given the nature of the change, I think a successful build and a successful run
of those tests is goo
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:40:01 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes the usages of
> `SecurityManager` related APIs from the `jdk.net` module? This addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8344236.
>
> No new tests have been added and existing t
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:40:01 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes the usages of
> `SecurityManager` related APIs from the `jdk.net` module? This addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8344236.
>
> No new tests have been added and existing t
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:40:01 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes the usages of
> `SecurityManager` related APIs from the `jdk.net` module? This addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8344236.
>
> No new tests have been added and existing t
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:40:01 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes the usages of
> `SecurityManager` related APIs from the `jdk.net` module? This addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8344236.
>
> No new tests have been added and existing t
Can I please get a review of this change which removes the usages of
`SecurityManager` related APIs from the `jdk.net` module? This addresses
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8344236.
No new tests have been added and existing tests in tier1, tier2 and tier3 have
completed without any related
