On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:34:16 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> This patch attempts to address a rare test failure where read from a socket
> succeeds immediately after sending the response.
>
> The existing `readRequest` method did not verify if it received the entire
> request. The method `readOn
> According to
> [rfc6455](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6455.html#section-5.5.1), the
> close frame MAY contain a body, i.e. it is considered
> [optional](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119#section-5). It seems that
> the contemporary JDK HEAD (tip) does populate the body and thus enab
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:04:00 GMT, Michal Karm Babacek wrote:
>> Checking the response URI is good but for the mainline I'd advise to check
>> both the response URI and the body. It's fine to not check the response body
>> on the update releases where
>> [JDK-8240666](https://bugs.openjdk.org/b
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:04:00 GMT, Michal Karm Babacek wrote:
>> Checking the response URI is good but for the mainline I'd advise to check
>> both the response URI and the body. It's fine to not check the response body
>> on the update releases where
>> [JDK-8240666](https://bugs.openjdk.org/b
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:57:30 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/net/HttpURLConnection/SetAuthenticator/HTTPTestClient.java
>> line 53:
>>
>>> 51: try {
>>> 52: Thread.sleep(500);
>>> 53: } catch (InterruptedException iex) {
>>
>> If it only fails
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:42:12 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Checking the response URI is good but for the mainline I'd advise to check
> both the response URI and the body. It's fine to not check the response body
> on the update releases where
> [JDK-8240666](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:50:30 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> The test has been observed failing once in the CI, on windows, with a
>> BindException (address already in use) on the client side. This usually
>> means that the system has run out of ephemeral ports or file descriptors.
>> The propo
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 14:50:21 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> The test has been observed failing once in the CI, on windows, with a
> BindException (address already in use) on the client side. This usually means
> that the system has run out of ephemeral ports or file descriptors. The
> proposed fix
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:34:16 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> This patch attempts to address a rare test failure where read from a socket
> succeeds immediately after sending the response.
>
> The existing `readRequest` method did not verify if it received the entire
> request. The method `readOn
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:55:30 GMT, Michal Karm Babacek wrote:
> According to
> [rfc6455](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6455.html#section-5.5.1), the
> close frame MAY contain a body, i.e. it is considered
> [optional](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119#section-5). It seems that
> the co
This patch attempts to address a rare test failure where read from a socket
succeeds immediately after sending the response.
The existing `readRequest` method did not verify if it received the entire
request. The method `readOneRequest` (copied from other tests) makes sure that
we read the trai
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:55:30 GMT, Michal Karm Babacek wrote:
> According to
> [rfc6455](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6455.html#section-5.5.1), the
> close frame MAY contain a body, i.e. it is considered
> [optional](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119#section-5). It seems that
> the co
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:52:36 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Hello @Karm,
>
> > According to
> > [rfc6455](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6455.html#section-5.5.1), the
> > close frame MAY contain a body, i.e. it is considered
> > [optional](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119#section-5). It s
According to
[rfc6455](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6455.html#section-5.5.1), the close
frame MAY contain a body, i.e. it is considered
[optional](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119#section-5). It seems that the
contemporary JDK HEAD (tip) does populate the body and thus enables
`Hand
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:55:30 GMT, Michal Karm Babacek wrote:
> According to
> [rfc6455](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6455.html#section-5.5.1), the
> close frame MAY contain a body, i.e. it is considered
> [optional](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119#section-5). It seems that
> the co
15 matches
Mail list logo
