Hi
please oblige and review the fix below to address the issue in JDK-8021372:
NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces() returns duplicate hardware address
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8021372/webrev/
the handling of the Ipv6IfIndex was suspect when setting the
interface index and when ret
to me passed index couldn't be 0 so null check is redundant,
but I don't mind to keep it.
It might make sense to explicitly check passed index for 0 above
loop.
-Dmitry
On 2013-09-03 13:23, Mark Sheppard wrote:
Hi
please oblige and review the fix below to address the issue in
J
Hi
based on feedback for initial fix, an amended webrev has been created.
So, please oblige and review the fix below to address the issue in
JDK-8021372: NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces() returns duplicate
hardware address
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8021372/webrev.01/
thervm mode.
2) remove all exception handling code, and just declare all methods
to throw Exception. The jtreg harness will show the test as failed
if an unhandled exception is thrown.
-Chris.
On 04/09/2013 08:59, Mark Sheppard wrote:
Hi
based on feedback for initial fix, an amended
Hi
please oblige and review the webrev below which addresses the issue
problem:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8024675
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8024675/webrev/
The test has been amended to only consider NetworkInterfaces
that are active (i.e. isUp() == true) and
Hi
please oblige and review the webrev below which addresses the issue
problem:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6458027
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/6458027/webrev/
the core of the issue is that a windows platform may be IPv6 enabled, but
an individual adapter/interf
module,
but it seems this file contains native code common to both dual
stack/two stacks
mode. We probably should move this code to a different source file
some time,
but it might be useful to put a comment in at least to say that it is
common
to both modes.
Michael
On 15/09/13 12:34, Mark
a comment in at least to say that it is
common
to both modes.
I'm not sure what what code you are referring to here, but as far as I
am aware there is no dual stack code in this file. Yes, there is both
IPv4 and IPv6, but both should be on separate sockets.
-Chris.
Michael
On
yep. Forget that as well. I thought it was being called from common
code. So, I'm missing how this
code is relevant then on Vista, which should be using the dual stack
implementation then ?
Michael
-Chris.
Michael
On 15/09/13 12:34, Mark Sheppard wrote:
Hi
please oblige and
201 - 209 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
