Re: Reminder about reported problem in NetworkInterface.c

2016-05-16 Thread dalibor topic
ty/oca-486395.html#b . You may be confusing the OCA with something else. At this time, there are no JUGs with an OCA. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. &

Re: JEP 321: HTTP Client (Standard)

2017-12-05 Thread dalibor topic
eterminations is necessity, rather than expertise, for example. In some cases, both properties may hold, of course, but I don't think that's a valid assertion in general. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089

Re: JEP 321: HTTP Client (Standard)

2017-12-05 Thread dalibor topic
On 05.12.2017 14:48, David Lloyd wrote: On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, dalibor topic wrote: On 04.12.2017 22:56, David Lloyd wrote: saying "Here it is, it's all done, what do you think?". I've certainly never had opportunity to try it out: given its status as an incub

Re: RFR: JDK-8257235: [PATCH] InetAddress.isReachable: Try to use an IPPROTO_ICMP socket type before attempting RAW_SOCK

2020-12-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 07:54:23 GMT, Jamie Le Tual wrote: > Users have been able to send ICMP packets without the need for root > privileges or the CAP_NET_RAW capability since at least kernel 3.11. > > For some time now, if the kernel parameter net.ipv4.ping_group_range included > the gid of a

Re: Request for comments: Bug 6306820

2007-06-01 Thread Dalibor Topic
Richard, a small meta-comment: URLs to the jdk-collaboration site will only be visible to members of that project, i.e. not to all OpenJDK developers. cheers, dalibor topic

Re: Request for comments: Bug 6306820

2007-06-05 Thread Dalibor Topic
; If there is a new preference I am happy to switch to that? No need to switch, if that works for you. But for the benefit of others who would be interested in following the discussion along with the code, I'd suggest posting the patches as unified diffs attached to your RFCs. cheers, dalibor topic