brary /test/lib` to
the test headers to be able to use it).
best regards,
-- daniel
[1]
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/tip/test/lib/jdk/test/lib/NetworkConfiguration.java#l383
On 21/08/2019 07:55, Nick Gasson wrote:
Hi,
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229912
Webrev:
On 21/08/2019 18:30, Alan Bateman wrote:
Daniel - if there are other changes to this test then it might be worth
re-examining the ensureXXX methods. The naming is very strange as they
return a boolean. Also they print messages to say that the test is
skipped but it's the caller that will determi
Hi,
Bug: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngasson/8251517/webrev.0/
Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251517
This case fails in our testing when run with -Xcomp on a fastdebug
build. The 5s socket read timeout is too short for this configuration.
Fix by scaling by the jtreg timeout fac
Hi Daniel,
On 08/14/20 17:27 pm, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Looks good to me. But while you're at it, could you make
> the `ok` and `requests` fields volatile?
>
Sure, this one ok to push?
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngasson/8251517/webrev.1/
--
Thanks,
Nick
