4212324: Packets sent to broadcast address not received on servers bound to specific addr

Hi Is this the right place to discuss/post patches for Java 1.7? If not, what is? Sun's websites are so confusing... Has there been any work on the bug I referred to in the subject? If not, read on. On most operating systems (Windows being the exception as usual), binding to a non-0.0.0.0 IP add

6370908: Add support for HTTP_CONNECT proxy in Socket class

e to use this solution (with some way to change socket identity) in a patch that adds a java.net.HttpSocketImpl class similar to the java.net.SocksSocketImpl class that's already used to tunnel through SOCKS proxies? If not, in what other way should such a patch be done? Thank you Damjan Jova

Re: 6370908: Add support for HTTP_CONNECT proxy in Socket class

ge of the authentication schemes it already supports. Not a > big deal, just needs to be done. Then I'll try to get it done. > -Chris. Thank you Damjan Jovanovic > On 21/02/2010 13:09, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >> Hi >> >>> From http://bugs.sun.com/view_bu

Re: 6370908: Add support for HTTP_CONNECT proxy in Socket class

many sockets as it takes and somehow adopt the final socket into HttpConnectSocketImpl's own. Any suggestions? > -Chris. Damjan > On 21/02/2010 13:09, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >> Hi >> >>> From http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6370908 >> >>

SOCKSv4 traversal broken?

nnection through a different socket to check the SOCKS version? Most applications avoid this problem by treating SOCKSv4 and SOCKSv5 proxies as completely different proxy types. Thank you Damjan Jovanovic

Re: 6370908: Add support for HTTP_CONNECT proxy in Socket class

this RFE never made > it back yet and has been sitting for a few years now. > -Chris. > > On 24/02/2010 17:28, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Christopher Hegarty - Sun >> Microsystems Ireland  wrote: >>> >>> Hi Damja

Re: 6370908: Add support for HTTP_CONNECT proxy in Socket class

sing > HttpURLConnection directly and having its socket exposed. Though, I'm still > not convinced of this solution either. > > -Chris > > Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >> Hi Chris >> >> I think that without authentication, you'll just get another RFE

Re: Code Review 6964547: Impossible to set useV4 in SocksSocketImpl

Can I also suggest that Proxy.Type.SOCKS gets deprecated and Proxy.Type.SOCKS4 and Proxy.Type.SOCKS5 get introduced instead? Just about every application treats SOCKS 4 and 5 as different proxy types, only Java tries to lump them together. On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote: >

Re: RFR: 7131399: Poll system call appears to be broken on Mac OS [macosx]

th 1024 bits (a common value), you only have to create >= 1021 file descriptors (and of course stdin/stdout/stderr) to exceed this limit, and end up with a file descriptor for which FD_SET breaks. This will be the case even if that file descriptor is the only file descriptor you are trying to add to the bitset. Please reconsider. Regards Damjan Jovanovic

Re: TCP tunneling through authenticating HTTP proxy

Guys, there was a patch for this feature (use of HTTP proxies with CONNECT request in java.net.Socket) floating around in February/March 2010, the latest version of which is at http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2010-March/001642.html I helped write it so let me know if you need any he

Re: TCP tunneling through authenticating HTTP proxy

> this patch. > > Thank you, > -- Vasiliy > > > On 25.10.2012 18:29, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >> Guys, there was a patch for this feature (use of HTTP proxies with >> CONNECT request in java.net.Socket) floating around in February/March >> 2010, the latest