On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:49:29 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could I get the following PR review please? It adds a new JDK specific
>> extended socket option
>> called IP_DONTFRAGMENT, which disables IP packet fragmentation in both IPv4
>> and IPv6
>> UDP sockets (NIO DatagramChannels
> Hi,
>
> Could I get the following PR review please? It adds a new JDK specific
> extended socket option
> called IP_DONTFRAGMENT, which disables IP packet fragmentation in both IPv4
> and IPv6
> UDP sockets (NIO DatagramChannels). For IPv4 in particular, it sets the DF
> (Dont Fragment) bit
>
> Hi,
>
> Could I get the following PR review please? It adds a new JDK specific
> extended socket option
> called IP_DONTFRAGMENT, which disables IP packet fragmentation in both IPv4
> and IPv6
> UDP sockets (NIO DatagramChannels). For IPv4 in particular, it sets the DF
> (Dont Fragment) bit
>
> Hi,
>
> Could I get the following PR review please? It adds a new JDK specific
> extended socket option
> called IP_DONTFRAGMENT, which disables IP packet fragmentation in both IPv4
> and IPv6
> UDP sockets (NIO DatagramChannels). For IPv4 in particular, it sets the DF
> (Dont Fragment) bit
>
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:47:01 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could I get the following PR review please? It adds a new JDK specific
>> extended socket option
>> called IP_DONTFRAGMENT, which disables IP packet fragmentation in both IPv4
>> and IPv6
>> UDP sockets (NIO DatagramChannels
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:50:57 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fix whitespace
>
> src/jdk.net/windows/native/libextnet/WindowsSocketOptions.c line 112:
>
>> 110: retu
> Hi,
>
> Could I get the following PR review please? It adds a new JDK specific
> extended socket option
> called IP_DONTFRAGMENT, which disables IP packet fragmentation in both IPv4
> and IPv6
> UDP sockets (NIO DatagramChannels). For IPv4 in particular, it sets the DF
> (Dont Fragment) bit
>
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:54:02 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> test/jdk/jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption/DontFragmentTest.java line 44:
>>
>>> 42: StandardProtocolFamily fam = args[0].equals("ipv4") ? INET :
>>> INET6;
>>> 43: System.out.println("Family = " + fam);
>>> 44: test
> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>
> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>
> The majority of fixes are in comments. A handful is in strings, one in a
> local variable n
> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>
> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>
> The majority of fixes are in comments. A handful is in strings, one in a
> local variable n
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:53:35 GMT, Conor Cleary wrote:
>> **Issue**
>> When using the `HttpClient.send()` to send a GET request created using the
>> `HttpRequest.newBuilder()`, a `Content-length: 0` header is set. This
>> behaviour causes issues with many services as a body related header is
>>
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:43:12 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Conor Cleary has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8283544: Updated URI creation
>
> test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/ContentLengthHeaderTest.java line 202:
>
>> 200:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:44:35 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/ContentLengthHeaderTest.java line 202:
>>
>>> 200: } else {
>>> 201: String responseBody = exchange.getRequestMethod() + "
>>> request contained an unexpected " +
>>> 202:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:24:43 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
>> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>>
>> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>>
>> The majority of fixes ar
> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>
> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>
> The majority of fixes are in comments. A handful is in strings, one in a
> local variable n
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 10:19:08 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Hello Conor,
>>
>> I had a look at this latest update to the `Http1Request`. The github diff
>> isn't easy to understand/explain in this case, so I'll paste here the latest
>> code contained in this PR, from that method. It looks like:
>
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:50:12 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
>> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>>
>> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>>
>> The majority of fixes ar
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:50:12 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
>> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>>
>> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>>
>> The majority of fixes ar
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:50:12 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
>> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>>
>> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>>
>> The majority of fixes ar
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:07:09 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those
> changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
>
> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically)
>
> The majority of fixes are in c
20 matches
Mail list logo
