Can I please get a review for this test only change which proposes to enable
debug logs from the test that failed intermittently? This change addresses
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8278961.
The change passes the (test specific) `-d` option to enable logs from that test
by default. W
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 13:03:39 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
>> Instead of something like
>>
>> long x;
>> long y;
>> return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1);
>>
>> we can use `return Long.compare(x, y);`
>>
>> All replacements are done with IDE.
>
> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incr
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:52:53 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review for this test only change which proposes to enable
> debug logs from the test that failed intermittently? This change addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8278961.
>
> The change passes the (test
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:52:53 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review for this test only change which proposes to enable
> debug logs from the test that failed intermittently? This change addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8278961.
>
> The change passes the (test
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:21:59 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this test only change which proposes to enable
>> debug logs from the test that failed intermittently? This change addresses
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8278961.
>>
>> The change passes th
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:21:12 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this test only change which proposes to enable
>> debug logs from the test that failed intermittently? This change addresses
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8278961.
>>
>> The change passes th
