On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:42:48 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
> There are few places in code where manual `for` loop is used with Iterator to
> iterate over Collection.
> Instead of manual `for` cycles it's preferred to use enhanced-for cycle
> instead: it's less verbose, makes code easier to read
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:37:46 GMT, Masanori Yano wrote:
> Please review this change to the Unix implementations of
> sun.nio.ch.sctp.Sctp*ChannelImpl#implCloseSelectableChannel()
> to be same as SocketChannelImpl at JDK-7118373. (The preClose is missing a
> check for the ST_KILLED state.)
This
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:42:48 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
> There are few places in code where manual `for` loop is used with Iterator to
> iterate over Collection.
> Instead of manual `for` cycles it's preferred to use enhanced-for cycle
> instead: it's less verbose, makes code easier to read
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:42:48 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
> There are few places in code where manual `for` loop is used with Iterator to
> iterate over Collection.
> Instead of manual `for` cycles it's preferred to use enhanced-for cycle
> instead: it's less verbose, makes code easier to read
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:42:48 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
> There are few places in code where manual `for` loop is used with Iterator to
> iterate over Collection.
> Instead of manual `for` cycles it's preferred to use enhanced-for cycle
> instead: it's less verbose, makes code easier to read
