Integrated: 8255674: SSLEngine class description is missing "case" in switch statement

2021-05-25 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On Tue, 25 May 2021 04:36:53 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Can I please get a review for this trivial fix in the code sample in javadoc > comment of `javax.net.ssl.SSLEngine` class? > > I've run `make docs-image` locally and the generated javadoc after this > change looks fine. This pull request

Re: RFR: 8255674: SSLEngine class description is missing "case" in switch statement

2021-05-25 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On Tue, 25 May 2021 04:36:53 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Can I please get a review for this trivial fix in the code sample in javadoc > comment of `javax.net.ssl.SSLEngine` class? > > I've run `make docs-image` locally and the generated javadoc after this > change looks fine. Thank you Xuelei

Re: RFR: 8263561: Re-examine uses of LinkedList [v2]

2021-05-25 Thread Сергей Цыпанов
> The usage of `LinkedList` is senseless and can be replaced with either > `ArrayList` or `ArrayDeque` which are both more compact and effective. > > jdk:tier1 and jdk:tier2 are both ok Сергей Цыпанов has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous commits have been removed. The i

Re: RFR: 8263561: Re-examine uses of LinkedList [v3]

2021-05-25 Thread Сергей Цыпанов
> The usage of `LinkedList` is senseless and can be replaced with either > `ArrayList` or `ArrayDeque` which are both more compact and effective. > > jdk:tier1 and jdk:tier2 are both ok Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

Re: RFR: 8263561: Re-examine uses of LinkedList [v4]

2021-05-25 Thread Сергей Цыпанов
> The usage of `LinkedList` is senseless and can be replaced with either > `ArrayList` or `ArrayDeque` which are both more compact and effective. > > jdk:tier1 and jdk:tier2 are both ok Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incrementa

Integrated: 8267683: rfc7301Grease8F value not displayed correctly in SSLParameters javadoc

2021-05-25 Thread Bradford Wetmore
On Tue, 25 May 2021 18:03:51 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote: > Simple typo fix. Somehow the trailing "u" got omitted, so the code won't > parse when fed into the compiler. > > Resulting javadoc output now compiles. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: e751b7b1 Author:Bradfo

RFR: 8267683: rfc7301Grease8F value not displayed correctly in SSLParameters javadoc

2021-05-25 Thread Bradford Wetmore
Simple typo fix. Somehow the trailing "u" got omitted, so the code won't parse when fed into the compiler. Resulting javadoc output now compiles. - Commit messages: - Codereview Comments. - 8267683: rfc7301Grease8F value not displayed correctly in SSLParameters javadoc Changes:

Re: RFR: 8267683: rfc7301Grease8F value not displayed correctly in SSLParameters javadoc

2021-05-25 Thread Sean Coffey
On Tue, 25 May 2021 18:03:51 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote: > Simple typo fix. Somehow the trailing "u" got omitted, so the code won't > parse when fed into the compiler. > > Resulting javadoc output now compiles. Looks good! - Marked as reviewed by coffeys (Reviewer). PR: https:

RFR: 8267750: Incomplete fix for JDK-8267683

2021-05-25 Thread Bradford Wetmore
Missed updating today's changeset with the new variable name. It's a "one character fix." - Commit messages: - 8267750: Incomplete fix for JDK-8267683 Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4196/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=4196&range=00 Is

Re: RFR: 8267750: Incomplete fix for JDK-8267683

2021-05-25 Thread Jamil Nimeh
On Wed, 26 May 2021 01:12:14 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote: > Missed updating today's changeset with the new variable name. > > It's a "one character fix." Looks good. - Marked as reviewed by jnimeh (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4196

Integrated: 8267750: Incomplete fix for JDK-8267683

2021-05-25 Thread Bradford Wetmore
On Wed, 26 May 2021 01:12:14 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote: > Missed updating today's changeset with the new variable name. > > It's a "one character fix." This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: b33b8bc8 Author:Bradford Wetmore URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/com

RFR: 8267353: java/net/SctpSanity.java fails due to Protocol not supported

2021-05-25 Thread Jie Fu
Hi all, java/net/SctpSanity.java fails on some of our test machines due to Protocol not supported. The reason is that the test fails to detect all the cases when a machine doesn't support SCTP. The fix just follows what are done in [1][2][3] to detect unsupported paltforms at the beginning. T