Hi,
Could someone please take a look at my webrev for JDK-8246143:
'UnreferencedXXX tests fail when run with --illegal-access=deny'?
This patch addresses test failures with
test/jdk/java/net/DatagramSocket/UnreferencedDatagramSockets.java and
test/jdk/java/net/MulticastSocket/UnreferencedMult
Looks good to me Conor!
best regards,
-- daniel
On 11/06/2020 10:35, Conor Cleary wrote:
Hi,
Could someone please take a look at my webrev for JDK-8246143:
'UnreferencedXXX tests fail when run with --illegal-access=deny'?
This patch addresses test failures with
test/jdk/java/net/DatagramS
On 11/06/2020 10:35, Conor Cleary wrote:
Hi,
Could someone please take a look at my webrev for JDK-8246143:
'UnreferencedXXX tests fail when run with --illegal-access=deny'?
This patch addresses test failures with
test/jdk/java/net/DatagramSocket/UnreferencedDatagramSockets.java and
test/jdk
The security.properties file in Java 11 (and later) have a new
configuration:
# The categories are:
#
# hostInfo - IOExceptions thrown by java.net.Socket and the socket
types in the
# java.nio.channels package will contain enhanced exception
# message information
#
# The p
On 11/06/2020 14:31, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
The security.properties file in Java 11 (and later) have a new
configuration:
# The categories are:
#
# hostInfo - IOExceptions thrown by java.net.Socket and the socket
types in the
# java.nio.channels package will contain enhanced exception
Hello Alan,
On 11/06/20 7:18 pm, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 11/06/2020 14:31, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> The security.properties file in Java 11 (and later) have a new
>> configuration:
>>
>> # The categories are:
>> #
>> # hostInfo - IOExceptions thrown by java.net.Socket and the socket
>> types in th
On 11/06/2020 14:59, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
:
Is this a valid use case to have this part of the JDK code enhanced to
include the additional host/port information (of course when that
security property is enabled)?
Yes but there there are always security concerns with including too much
information
On 11/06/20 7:40 pm, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 11/06/2020 14:59, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> :
>> Is this a valid use case to have this part of the JDK code enhanced to
>> include the additional host/port information (of course when that
>> security property is enabled)?
>>
> Yes but there there are al
On 11/06/20 7:47 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
> I'll open a JBS enhancement in a short while to have this part enhanced
> to report the additional details only when the specific security
> property is enabled.
I've created https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8247413 to track this.
-Jaikiran
