Re: RFR[8236105]: Behaviors of DatagramSocket/DatagramChannel::socket send methods are not always consistent

2020-01-16 Thread Daniel Fuchs
Hi Patrick, DatagramSocket.java: 694 * is not set. this line needs to be removed. Otherwise this looks good to me. A release note might get requested by the CSR lead. best regards, -- daniel On 13/01/2020 16:30, Patrick Concannon wrote: Hi, Could someone please review m

Re: RFR: 8236859: WebSocket over authenticating proxy fails with NPE

2020-01-16 Thread Chris Hegarty
Daniel, > On 13 Jan 2020, at 13:06, Daniel Fuchs wrote: > > Hi, > > Please find below a fix for: > 8236859: WebSocket over authenticating proxy fails with NPE > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236859 > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8236859/webrev.00/ There is a lot

Re: 8236925: (dc) Upgrade DatagramChannel socket adaptor to extend MulticastSocket

2020-01-16 Thread Chris Hegarty
> On 14 Jan 2020, at 19:23, Alan Bateman wrote: > > ... > Here's the updated webrev that changes oldImpl to be final. >http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8236925/2/webrev/ Generally, I agree with updating the socket adapter to support multicast. It will certainly help with future work in t

Re: 8236925: (dc) Upgrade DatagramChannel socket adaptor to extend MulticastSocket

2020-01-16 Thread Alan Bateman
On 16/01/2020 11:45, Chris Hegarty wrote: : Generally, I agree with updating the socket adapter to support multicast. It will certainly help with future work in this area. The instanceof checks in the constructors highlight that there is an abstraction missing here - to support creating a custom

Re: 8236925: (dc) Upgrade DatagramChannel socket adaptor to extend MulticastSocket

2020-01-16 Thread Chris Hegarty
> On 16 Jan 2020, at 12:10, Alan Bateman wrote: > > On 16/01/2020 11:45, Chris Hegarty wrote: >> : >> Generally, I agree with updating the socket adapter to support >> multicast. It will certainly help with future work in this area. >> >> The instanceof checks in the constructors highlight tha