Hi Alan,
Here is the new webrev - I believe I have addressed all your comments:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8231260/webrev.01
best regards,
-- daniel
On 04/10/2019 14:55, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 04/10/2019 14:34, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
:
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs
On 07/10/2019 12:34, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Alan,
Here is the new webrev - I believe I have addressed all your comments:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8231260/webrev.01
Thanks for the update, this version looks good to me.
-Alan.
> On 7 Oct 2019, at 12:34, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Here is the new webrev - I believe I have addressed all your comments:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8231260/webrev.01
Looks good Daniel.
-Chris
* Daniel Fuchs:
> Here is the new webrev - I believe I have addressed all your comments:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8231260/webrev.01
Looks good to me too. Sorry for the distraction earlier.
Thanks,
Florian
Hi Daniel,
wrt impl note ... would some explanation on the esoteric reason for a now
possible BindException be
useful, also? namely that on some platforms the socket is unbound during the
disconnect and requires a re-bind, which for
ephemeral ports allocated may result in a BindException.
t
