Hi Thomas,
thanks for reviewing.
The test has also passed our internal testing. I'll run it through jdk-submit
and then push it in the course of the day.
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Stüfe [mailto:thomas.stu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 27. April 2018 18
On 30/04/18 09:00, Langer, Christoph wrote:
...
Taking this input I have updated my webrev to round things up a little bit:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8202181.1/
Thank you Christophe, this latest version looks good.
I'll run some tests on it and report the results by tomorrow
Hi Chris,
thanks for looking at this. I just received positive confirmation from
jdk-submit. Our internal tests did not show regressions as well. So I'll wait
for word on your tests before submitting.
Thanks
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Hegarty [mailto:chris.hega...@ora
On 30/04/18 11:07, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Chris,
thanks for looking at this. I just received positive confirmation from
jdk-submit. Our internal tests did not show regressions as well. So I'll wait
for word on your tests before submitting.
Do you have a link to the jdk-submit job, or an
On 30/04/18 10:44, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 30/04/18 09:00, Langer, Christoph wrote:
...
Taking this input I have updated my webrev to round things up a
little bit:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8202181.1/
Thank you Christophe, this latest version looks good.
I'll run some tests
A number of implementation changes have accumulated in the
sandbox since the initial integration of the HTTP Client.
The changes mainly consist of:
- Test stabilization fixes.
- Clean up of code left over from early prototyping.
- Some small performance improvements.
- General bug fixing.
ht
On 23/04/18 12:33, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Thanks Jaikiran,
I think your patch looks good. I filed the following CSR to track
the Java SE API ( javadoc ) change.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202139
Once approved, I can sponsor this for you.
Pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jd
