On 18/12/2017 21:24, Paul Marks wrote:
So if the kernel decides to block, the thread will be suspended
(consuming no CPU) until it's done.
However, the UDP protocol has no concept of flow control, so blasting
out packets without any rate limit or acknowledgement mechanism is not
a good ide
Aside from the fact that I should watch out for blasting too many packets at
once, and realizing that this one "server/controller" machine has to control
100 or more client receiving machines, with smallish packets, is there any
advantage at all relative to the linux kernel in having more than
This is follow on from a previous review of the same bug fix. The fix
is now targeted specifically for jdk10.
A slightly different approach is taken this time. But, your comment
below is incorporated into the new version Daniel
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8192966/webrev.2/
Than
Hi Michael,
On 19/12/2017 14:20, Michael McMahon wrote:
This is follow on from a previous review of the same bug fix. The fix
is now targeted specifically for jdk10.
A slightly different approach is taken this time. But, your comment
below is incorporated into the new version Daniel
Webrev: ht
Hello,
it is a bit unlikely that there is much difference (especially for as low as
200 packets), but I would recommend you actually try it with your specific
traffic pattern and System load. Not much a Java developer can say about
various Linux kernel versions and their drivers.
Gruss
Bernd
-
