> On 1 Dec 2017, at 07:13, vyom tewari wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks for review, while my testing i discovered issue in the way we handle
> extended socket options and standard socket options. I fixed it and updated
> one test as well.
>
> I removed one redundant "if check" which i think
+1
On 12/2/2017 4:17 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 1 Dec 2017, at 07:13, vyom tewari wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for review, while my testing i discovered issue in the way we handle
extended socket options and standard socket options. I fixed it and updated
one test as well.
I removed one redun
Have there been any recent developments, updates, or insights on this
issue? I wonder if a gradual change to RFC 3986 support might be more
appropriate: for example, start with*just* accepting empty SSP.
If the compatibility requirements of java.net.URI are too stringent to
allow for any change
