On 17/11/16 12:12, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi,
please review a downport of a few small fixes to JDK 8 which were done
through bugs 8034174, 8034182 and 8048518 to JDK 9 already.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8169865
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8169865.8
Hi Michael -
Some follow-up/updates on items from my previous email inline below:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Tobias Thierer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Michael McMahon <
> michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The intention behind those interfaces is primarily to p
Hi Christoph,
On 03/11/16 15:46, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi again,
I have to make one addition to my points:
Java_java_net_Inet6AddressImpl_getLocalHostName:
- made getaddrinfo/getnameinfo turnaround the default, before
it was only used on solaris. But it should be the default since
Tobias,
If you look at the code in the sandbox [*], the notion of a default
client has been removed. Having global static default instances is
problematic. Http Clients are lightweight, easy to configure and
pass around, if that is what you want.
-Chris.
[*] hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/
Hi Chris,
thanks for looking into this.
First of all I'm glad that you agree to make the getLocalHostname call
consistent throughout all implementations. :)
However, my feeling at the moment rather is to prefer just return the
gethostname() API result instead of doing getaddrinfo/getnameinfo o
Thanks, Chris.
It's pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/90d2c6ddcedd
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Hegarty [mailto:chris.hega...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Montag, 21. November 2016 11:54
> To: Langer, Christoph
> Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; jdk8u-...@openjdk.java.
