Re: JDK-8148424 Support ipv6-only environments

2016-01-28 Thread Alan Bateman
On 28/01/2016 02:29, Martin Buchholz wrote: Are y'all interested in our ipv6-only changes? https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8148424 If yes, there will be some work on both sides, mostly for multi-platform testing. I think so, this is configuration that we attempted to test several times,

Re: RFR: 8147462: URI.toURL could be more efficient for most non-opaque URIs

2016-01-28 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 27 Jan 2016, at 17:24, Claes Redestad wrote: > > On 2016-01-18 17:20, Claes Redestad wrote: >> >> The ability for URLStreamHandler implementations to override the parseURL >> method seem to prevent this improvement unless we only do this for a subset >> of known, well-behaved URLStreamHan

Re: RFR: 8147462: URI.toURL could be more efficient for most non-opaque URIs

2016-01-28 Thread Claes Redestad
On 2016-01-28 16:52, Chris Hegarty wrote: ... This looks fine Claes. Thanks, Chris! Maybe just a comment on the fact that character based comparison is being used for perf reasons. In an older version of the webrev, there was an updated to an existing test, test/java/net/URI/URItoURLTest

Re: RFR: 8147462: URI.toURL could be more efficient for most non-opaque URIs

2016-01-28 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 28 Jan 2016, at 16:38, Claes Redestad wrote: > On 2016-01-28 16:52, Chris Hegarty wrote: >>> ... >> This looks fine Claes. > > Thanks, Chris! > >> >> Maybe just a comment on the fact that character based comparison is >> being used for perf reasons. >> >> In an older version of the webrev,

Re: RFR: 8147462: URI.toURL could be more efficient for most non-opaque URIs

2016-01-28 Thread Alan Bateman
This looks okay. I think it would be good to put a javadoc comment on this method, also maybe move it to below all the constructors rather than in the middle. -Alan. On 28/01/2016 16:38, Claes Redestad wrote: On 2016-01-28 16:52, Chris Hegarty wrote: ... This looks fine Claes. Thanks

Re: RFR: 8147462: URI.toURL could be more efficient for most non-opaque URIs

2016-01-28 Thread Claes Redestad
On 2016-01-28 20:56, Alan Bateman wrote: This looks okay. I think it would be good to put a javadoc comment on this method, also maybe move it to below all the constructors rather than in the middle. -Alan. Sure, as this is package-private API a short description and reference to the UR