Thank you all for the help!
From: Seán Coffey [mailto:sean.cof...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 12:07 PM
To: Alan Bateman; Valery Kopylov (Akvelon); Martin Sawicki (MS OPEN TECH);
jdk7u-...@openjdk.java.net
Cc: OpenJDK Network Dev list; Kirk Shoop (MS OPEN TECH)
Subject: Re: Backport
Hi Chris,
I looked at your solution to make URLStreamHandlerFactory interface a
service provider using ServiceLoader API and in addition adding new URL
static method to programmaticaly register URLStreamHandlerFactories.
There are a couple of issues with your approach I'd like to discuss.
Th
On 31/01/2015 19:42, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Chris,
I looked at your solution to make URLStreamHandlerFactory interface a
service provider using ServiceLoader API and in addition adding new
URL static method to programmaticaly register
URLStreamHandlerFactories. There are a couple of issues wi
Hi Alan,
On 01/31/2015 10:33 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 31/01/2015 19:42, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Chris,
I looked at your solution to make URLStreamHandlerFactory interface a
service provider using ServiceLoader API and in addition adding new
URL static method to programmaticaly register
UR
Hello,
What about simply rejecting overlapping programmatic registrations, and for
the service loader using the natural order (class loader search order). I
guess most extensions register new schemes only, as it was not easy before
in such a central shared system component. an ordering api might n
