On 28/01/2015 21:40, Chris Hegarty wrote:
I’ll make the change, add a test, and then update the webrev.
On second thoughts, it shouldn't need to be changed because the child
SOCKET is created before AcceptEx is used and so should already have the
inherit flag set correctly.
Has there been an
On 29 Jan 2015, at 09:21, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 28/01/2015 21:40, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> I’ll make the change, add a test, and then update the webrev.
>>
> On second thoughts, it shouldn't need to be changed because the child SOCKET
> is created before AcceptEx is used and so should already
On 29/01/2015 15:39, Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
Has there been any consideration given to writing a test for this? I thought we
had one or two tests for this already.
There are existing tests for client/connecting sockets, but none for accepted
sockets.
The test, and check, for accepted sockets
On 26/01/2015 13:48, Seán Coffey wrote:
Valeriy,
those changes look fine to me and I've verified that they run through
testing fine also. webrev here for reference :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8060170.7u.v3/webrev/
Can I have a jdk7u reviewer for this change ?
There is a race
