On 09/04/2014 22:19, Chris Hegarty wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8039470/02/webrev/
That, that is easier to see the changes.
In URL then it's not clear to me why the javadoc has to admit to a
"system default package". Would it make sense to change this to just say
that it falls b
On 10 Apr 2014, at 08:36, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 09/04/2014 22:19, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8039470/02/webrev/
> That, that is easier to see the changes.
>
> In URL then it's not clear to me why the javadoc has to admit to a "system
> default package". W
Hi,
This is the webrev for the 8u20 version of the fix that was reviewed
yesterday for 9.
JDK
===
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8036979.8u20/jdk/01/webrev/
Top repo
=
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8036979.8u20/top/01/webrev/
The good news is that the change is almost the sa
