On 25/03/2014 02:35, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi Michael,
I'm wondering how we could move this forward.
For the next step, is it just to draft a JEP for this change as a
beginning?
or should I get supports and approvals from some other groups or leaders ?
- Cheers
Jonathan
Is the proposal only for
Hello Chris,
Thank you very much for review of this fix and for addressing the review
request to the second possible reviewer. I am looking forward to
receiving any response from Weijun Wang. Also I would like to inform you
that jtreg regression tests specified below (both open and internal
p
The fix looks fine. You might want to remove the cache-related words from the
comment of the new isSupported method.
--Max
On Mar 25, 2014, at 18:48, Anton Litvinov wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Thank you very much for review of this fix and for addressing the review
> request to the second poss
Hello Max,
Thank you for review and approval of the fix. The sentence containing
cache-related words is removed from the comment of the new "isSupported"
method. The edited version of the fix is following.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alitvinov/8032832/jdk9/webrev.01
Thank you,
Anton
