Hi,
I have the following piece of code
URL url = new URL("file", "/", "C:\\temp\\Java6");
System.out.println(url);
URL url1 = new URL(url, "hello.html");
System.out.println(url1);
first System out prints as "file:///C:\temp\Java6\Lotus"
Second one prints the valu
On 09/08/2012 01:49, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 08/07/2012 06:09 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Hi,
A new revision of the Http client API planned for jdk 8 can be viewed
at the following link
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/httpclient/v0.3/
We would like to review the api on this mailing list.
On 09/08/12 00:00, Jed Wesley-Smith wrote:
Michael McMahon writes:
A new revision of the Http client API planned for jdk 8 can be viewed
at the following link
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/httpclient/v0.3/
We would like to review the api on this mailing list.
So, all comments are welc
On 09/08/12 06:10, Sean Chou wrote:
Hi Chris,
That's exactly my concern. I agree this provides best flexibility
and content convenient methods are not proper in this API. So, is there
going to have content specific convenient APIs like java.nio.file.Files
? Although it is a wrapper, it may
Wow, Mike. Great feedback.
I just scanned your comments, and agree/understand most of them. I'll
help Michael to feed them back into the API. Though, there'll probably
be a few follow up mails to answers your direct questions and seek
further clarification before the new rev of the API.
Than
Hi,
The return value from the getFlags() method in NetworkInterface.c is
interpreted in 2 ways.
- If the value is negative an Exception is thrown
- Else the return value is considered as the flag mask obtained via the
ioctl call.
In rare cases is it possible the value in the ifr_flags could
Shirish,
I am not familiar with VIPA interfaces, but I don't see any
documentation that describes allowable values for flags that could cause
the integer representing it to contain a negative value.
I'm not opposed to the source changes, I just don't see that they are
required. Can you pleas
On 8/9/2012 4:55 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Shirish,
I am not familiar with VIPA interfaces, but I don't see any
documentation that describes allowable values for flags that could
cause the integer representing it to contain a negative value.
I'm not opposed to the source changes, I just don't
On 09/08/12 14:16, Shirish Kuncolienkar wrote:
I agree there is no general documentation available, AIX defines vipa
interface flag as "0x8000"
In which case I don't see any problems with your proposed source
changes. One could argue that maybe they should go through the specific
po
Chris,
Please go ahead and run the sanity builds and tests.
Thanks
-Shirish
On 8/9/2012 7:52 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 09/08/12 14:16, Shirish Kuncolienkar wrote:
I agree there is no general documentation available, AIX defines vipa
interface flag as "0x8000"
In which case I don
Changeset: 717ed00b7787
Author:sherman
Date: 2012-08-09 10:15 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/717ed00b7787
7189363: Regex Pattern compilation buggy for special sequences
Summary: fixed the incorrect implementation in expr(...)
Reviewed-by: psandoz, alanb
! src
Michael,
Looking good, some comments.
1) Why the use of CookieManager, rather than CookieHandler? I would
expect that CookieHandler would be a cleaner API
2) What is the impact on the sendHeader, setBody for HEAD requests?
3) I think HttpClient could be an interface and move the create me
12 matches
Mail list logo
